The Washington Post editorial board defended the controversial decision of Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser to remove the giant “Black lives are important“Art that covers the main city street near the White House.
Although many complained about Bowser’s move, thinking that it was a suitable for the opposition of Republicans with Black Lives Matter, the Committee claimed it was wise because it would marketed by President Trump, whose administration threatens the city’s independence from the Federal Government.
“It is not a cowardice, as they claim that critics of the mayor, but a practical attempt to protect DC from Republicans who threaten city autonomy for political purposes.” The committee wrote on Friday.
The Federal Judge resets Trump’s dismissal of the chairman of the Federal Employee Committee
The Washington Post’s editorial board argued that the real move for the mayor of DC, Muriel Bowser, to replace Black Lives Matter Art to place President Trump. (Getty)
The giant yellow letters were painted in the 16th NW Street, except that the intersection was renamed “Black Lives Matter Plaza” in the summer of 2020. During Trump’s first term.
The editorial board of the post was: “DC can respect Black Lives Matter without street art.”
Bowser approved changes after the day of chaotic protests at the location because of the police brutality after the murder of George Floyd by the police officer in Minneapolis and Breon Taylor by police officers Louisville.
The mayor announced earlier this week that The beach will be redesigned Students and artists, which the city is in charge of creating new frescoes for the area, causing protests on and around the square.
Bowser’s call comes because the Republicans were targeting Plaza in Congress. Tail. Andrew Clyde, R-G.
The post of post claimed that such attacks on the city by the Federal Government require the mayor to make these less concessions.
Black Lives Matter Plaza will be replaced, recently announced by Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. (Jacquelyn Martin, file)
In the introductory he said, “But what Bowser understands – and what many of her critics do not want to accept – is that she has a little power to prevent Trump and his fellow Republicans to damage the city. Her main task is now to minimize this damage.”
The work also mentioned Clyde’s account in particular, pointing to this as evidence that GOP MPs opposed the plateau so much that they were “willing to take away the city … the resources needed for functioning.”
The committee also mentioned that Trump recently “threatened” to take over the city to clean crime, graffiti and homeless camps. He told reporters In the aviation one last month, “I think we should take it strongly, take it by law and in turn, make it absolutely, flawlessly beautiful.”
The editorial board added that the Bowser renunciation of Blm Plaza “seems to pay off.” This continued, “the post reported this week that the president had given up on his endangered executive order, thanks to” constructive conversations “with the mayor’s staff. This is a win for the city.”
The post claimed that this struggle refers to the “wise choice of battles” and concluded with the idea that the city “focusing on questions that affect the daily lives of people: a decrease in crime, the construction of accessible housing and the creation of a vibrant economy”, not the street arts.
Click here to get the Fox News app
