Breaking News

The judge appointed Trump is reminiscent of a court group because of the “holy” threat statements


The federal judge named President Donald Trump in 2018 announced that he resigned from the largest federal judges’ associations, deciphering that the group had made a rare statement by condemning recent alleged judges last week, but remained silent for years, while conservative members of the judiciary were confronted with surveillance and attack.

Judge James C. Ho, from the US appellant -based court in New Orleans, for the fifth round, announced his departure from the Federal Association of Judges during a speech event on Saturday, hosted by a conservative federalist society at the Faculty of Law, University of Michigan. This comes in response to 1,100 members who published a statement on March 5, which partly said that “the judges must be allowed to do their job without fear of violence or intimidation of any kind.” Trump and his allies are becoming more critical of judges who blocked the Ministry of Government (Doge) and other aspects of the agenda of the administration, while Doge Elon Musk leader Last month, he called for a “immediate wave of judicial imperatives”.

“I was very surprised by that statement. The next morning I sent the e -Kost organization, saying that I wanted to resign,” Ho said of the Federal Association of Judges. “I explored for myself, and I also asked the association if they had ever issued such statements when justice Thomas received attacks or justice Alito. Justice Kavanaugh He was engaged in an attempt to assassination. We had judges of federal districts in Texas and Florida – as well as, I am sure, other countries, but these are the ones that immediately come to my mind – everything faced with the kinds of things that that statement complained to more. Did we see these statements in 2024 or 2023 or 2022? According to what I can say, no. ”

Who is Judge Amir Ali? Federal judge who appointed Biden in the center of Trump’s struggle for USAID

James Ho, a candidate for the fifth U.S. Appellate Court Judge, testifies during the November 15, 2017 Senate Committee Certificate of Senate Committee. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

“You cannot say that you are advocating for a judiciary independence only when it comes to decisions you like. It does not protect the judiciary, it is politicizing the judiciary,” Ho said, claiming that such statements actually damage the cause they try to go on. “Since one of two things are true when you are selective this way. And any of these options, I mean, bad thing. Option number one is that you are basically lying, you don’t really care about this principle, because you didn’t commit yourself to when the shoe was on another leg, so the world is not serious committed to court independence. “

“The alternative may be even worse, which is to tell the truth – you care about it, this principle, whether it is court independence or free speech. I think this concept refers to many things,” HO continued. “If you are telling the truth, you really care about this principle, but there are only some people who have so many antems for you that you do not think that they are worthy of this principle you are chasing.”

James Ho, an American lawyer and lawyer born in Taiwanese, who serves as a US Circle judge, speaks at the national convention of the lawyer of the Federalist Society on November 10, 2022. (Washington Post via Getty Images)

“And so what you think is a statement born of righteousness that I think many people perceive as only holy,” he concluded.

Fox News Digital addressed the federal association of judges for comment, but did not respond immediately.

Dog rules are likely to be subject to the requirements for public records, says the department who operates in ‘unusual secret’

President of the Federal Association of Judges, American Circle Judge J. Michelle Childs, Former President Joe Biden named Ue -the members of the members last week that “the judiciary is facing growing threats, including violence, intimidation, disinformation and unprecedented murder that challenges his independence,” Reuters states.

The federal judges’ Association then published a longer public statement the next day, which did not explain the special threats to certain judges.

J. Michelle Childs testifies during the hearing for the confirmation of the Senate Committee on the judiciary on April 27, 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

It all began to say that “recent events are a clear and urgent reminder that federal judges play a key role in supporting our democracy as a guardian of the rule of law.”

“In the history of our Republic, there has always been tension between the three separate and equal branches of the Federal Government, including criticisms of judicial interpretations. The FJA seeks to ensure that accurate information is shared with all US citizens related to the role of judiciary as defined in the US Constitution: to create an Introngenty in Congress.” Specific decisions Assessments of what “books on books” require. ”

The group praised those, including the Chief Judge of Supreme Court John Roberts, “who recently commented on the increase in criticism, threats and violence aimed at members of the judiciary.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The irresponsible rhetoric lined with disinformation undermines the public confidence that our judicial system can fulfill its constitutional duties,” the statement said. “The safety of federal judges and all those who serve in the judicial branch of our government are fundamental to their ability to support the rule of law and fulfill their constitutional duties without fear or unnecessary influence. Any erosion in independence is a threat to our Constitution and the legal law that it is not played in public security, not only in this public security Which is that it is only on protective security, not just legal security, should not only be legal public security, not only in this public security is just legal security only in this, which is about the public safety, not only in this is about the fact that it is in this public safety in this public safety. In connection with the public in connection with the public insurance in a relationship with an impartial judiciary. ”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com