The House Gop target campaign Dems that voted against Trump’s law that supported the Government’s government financing
EXCLUSIVE – House Gop’s The Campaign Committee aims to vote Democrats against the funding measure of the Federal Government until September 30 and avoiding the exclusion of the Government at the end of this week.
The National Republican Congress Committee launches digital ads against 35 Democrats of the house that can face challenging or competitive races in Midterms in 2026, when the GOP wants to defend its fragile majority in the Chamber.
Location, first divided with Fox News on Wednesday morning, they are entering hours after home, almost completely on party lines, voted 217-213 for the adoption of a Republican compiling law that reduces consumption without defense by approximately $ 13 billion, increases the consumption of defense by about $ 6 billion and gives the President the President Donald Trump More free space in how to spend funds.
Thanks to the difficult last minute to lobby Trump and his allies inside and outside the home, the GOP of the home did not need a single vote of Democrats to make the proposal of the law.
Trump’s proposal for the Law on Retention Financing Cleaning Key Obstacles
The speaker of the house Mike Johnson, R-L., Meets with journalists while Republicans are progressing their homes with a temporary account of GOP consumption that will retain federal agencies financed by September 30 in Capitol, Washington, on Tuesday, March 11, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
One Democrat, a moderate Jared Golden of Maine, which represents the district that Trump wore in the last three presidential elections, voted for a Republican measure.
And to that Republican who voted against the bill, far right -hander Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Trump and his allies threaten with a possible primary challenge next year when he was ready to re -choice.
Click here to read what is in the entire account
Digital ads NrccWhat are identical to all goals will be launched online in Democratic representatives Josh Harder (CA-09), Adam Gray (Ca-13), Jim Costa, (Ca-21), Raul Ruiz (Ca-25), George Whitesides (Ca-27), Derek Trans (Ca-45), Dave min (CA-47) and CA-47) Soto (FL-09) and Jared Moscowitz (FL-23) from Florida; Eric Sorensen (Il-17) of Illinois; Frank Mrvan (In-01) of Indiana; Kristen McDonald Rivet (MN-08) of Michigan; Don Davis (NC-01) from North Carolina; Chris Pappas (NH-01) and Maggie Goodlander (NH-02) of New Hampshire; Josh got (NJ-05) and Nellie Pou (NJ-09) of New Jersey; Gabe Vasquez (NM-02) from Novi Mexico; Dina Titus (NV-01), Susie Lee (NV-03) and Steven Horsford (NV-04) of Nevada; Tom SAZZI (NY-03), Laura Gillen (NY-04), Pat Ryan (NY-18) and Josh Riley (NY-19) of New York; Greg Landsman (OH-01), Marcy Kaptur (OH-09) and Emilia Syles (OH-13) of Ohija; Janelle Bynum (OR-05) from Oregon; Henry Cuellar (TX-28) and Vicente Gonzalez (TX-34) from Texas; Eugene Vindman (VA-07) from Virginia; and Marie Glueskamp Perez (WA-03) from Washington.
NRCC says that a modest advertisement is bought behind digital places.
“Democrats threw their torment at the expense of the American people, excluding the government just to achieve political points. After months of failure, they learned nothing and doubled on their unpleasant dysfunction.” Said NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella.
The Chairman of the House GOP Campaign Committee envisaged a prediction of around 2026.
Democrats disagree.
Minority leader Hakeem Jeffies, Dn.y., Center, left by Ambassador Fifth Aguilar, D-Calif., And Tail. Katherine Clark, D-Mass., A minority minority of the house, talks to reporters outside the home, while Republicans, on Monday, would within the march within the march within the road. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
“Powerful democratic voices for opposing this reckless law on Republican spending speaks for himself,” he told reporters, leader of the Hakem Jeffies’ minority house from New York, the highest Democrat in the Chamber.
AND House democratic The President of the California chair, Peta Aguilar of California, aimed at what he called a “partisan” measure and emphasized that “we vote strongly with this proposal for the law because it hurts the family.”
