Chris Broad states that corruption in ‘early-dube is an earthquake of SUB’ drama, Sunil Gavaskar claims that India was not earthquake
The decision of India National Cricket team to replace young Pacer Harshit Wound, because a versatile replacement for the brain earthquake shimam willum will in the fourth T20I match against England in full did not sit well with many cries, including Indians.
The drama took place when Jamie Overtton’s thump of 141.5 kph hit Shimit Duba on the helmet in the last India, before the English captain of Jos Buttler ran him. However, Dube has already done enough damage to the team for Cricket England in full.
Indian decision to replace shimamo dube with Harshit early in discussion of full Sparks among cricket experts
Shimitam Duba (53 34 ball runs) stuck to 87 partnerships with Hardik Pandya to help make men in blue recover from 57 for 4 and post 181 for 9 in the fourth T20I against England. However, the rights of controversy erupted after the hosts decided to bring themselves to the middle bowlers of the Nihh wound as a replacement for the brain earthquake for a comprehensive decision to decide on T20I in full.
Interestingly, India struck a versatile Ramandeep Singh on the bench, which seemed better as a replacement for the depth, but decided to choose a wound, despite the rules that obviously served a replacement similar to such situations in the international crisis.
Significantly, Ramandeep briefly entered as a replacement for Varun Chakravarthy during the match. This caused huge controversy, and many experts of England and India criticized the management of the Indian team for reducing their image using such tactics to win the series.
Chris Broad Slams ICC for ‘Bias and Corruption’ through replacing earthquakes shimam dube
Now, a former Judge of the English Crush and ICC, Chris Broad, has questioned the decision to allow Harshit wound as a replacement for the brain earthquake for shimaci will in full T20I. Former ICC match referee has called into question the control body and criticized the match officers for not preventing “bias and corruption” in the match.
Significantly, the wound played a key role in an Indian victory in 15 runners over England in full, taking 3 shots for 33 driving.
Chris Broad published, x: “Independent official officials were brought to stop such situations! Why is ICC back to ‘bad old days’ bias and corruption?”
Independent official officials have been brought to stop situations like this! Why does ICC go back to ‘bad old days’ bias and corruption? #Bcci #Icc #bias #Indveng
– Chris Broad (@Chrisbroad3) 1. February 2025
In a separate post on social networks, Broad suggested that ICC needs a mandate of use of a neutral matching judge. Responding to the controversy about controversy, the Englishman asked that the Indian judge could allow such a replacement. He stressed that the match officers must remain independent to avoid any bias.
Michael Vaughan and Kevin Pietersen invite matches over the order
Meanwhile, former English captain Michael Vaughan also joined the discussion. However, Vaughan did it indirectly with a touch of sarcasm through Retweet. He was joking that “Harshit wound would be a player if bats like Dubao.”
Will be a player if bats like Duboa 😜😜 https://t.co/yd6jx87fm6
– Michael Vaughan (@Michaelvaughan) 1. February 2025
Former English captain Kevin Pietersen, on the other hand, called the controversial replacement of the earthquake, saying that it was not an honest replacement. The commentator said the match judge should accept his mistake and move forward in front of the last game in Mumbai.
Kevin Pietersen posted on X: “The commissioner is quite a topic everywhere here, and my view is … it was never a replacement similar to, and the match judge should just raise his hand and say that he got that wrong one. The end of the event forever, And tonight we move on to another great conflict. “
The SUB earthquake is quite the topic everywhere here, and my view is … he was never similar to replacement, and the match judge should just raise his hand and say that he is wrong.
The end of the event forever and we move on to another great conflict this evening. 💫– Kevin Pietersen🦏 (@KP24) 2. February 2025
Sunil Gavaskar Slams Team India for their controversial decision
Even Sunil Gavaskar criticized the Indian team administration, saying that Shuum Dube did not overwhelm him until he hit until the end after being hit on the helmet. He emphasized that there is no “similar” replacement between Dube and Harshit Wounds.
Sunil Gavaskar wrote in her telegraph column: “Even the most beautiful stretching of the expression of similar, there was nothing like this between Dubo and wounds. With the language firmly in the cheek, it can be said that they are the same height and have the same standard in the ground.
Otherwise, there is nothing concerning. England has all the reasons to feel. This Indian team is a top team and they do not need its victories to disparage such acts. “
