The federal judge refused to impose sanctions on the lawyer who filed a submission that contained incorrect quotes and quotes he created artificial intelligence.
American District Judge Thomas Cullen said lawyer Thomas Guyer “possessed a mistake” and “took over the only responsibility” According to the transcript from hearing in October 2024.
Judge Cullen admitted that the use of generative AI in the legal profession became a “new norm”, but emphasized that lawyers who use it “still have to adhere to basic tenants of behavior”, which includes “taking reasonable measures” to ensure that applications are correct.
“Mr. Guyer, who is a great lawyer, who has long been involved in a high level at the courts across the United States, made a mistake,” said Judge Cullen. The judge also stated that what happened showed “one of the Padua of the Generative AI”.
American District Judge Thomas Cullen will not sanction lawyer Thomas Guyer, who admitted to using a generative AI in a submitted error. (East)
Lawyer in hot water after using AI for a show of information composed
The judge found that Guyer’s actions were not intentional, stating lawyer “Unknown record.” He also deserved Guyer, which pointed out the mistakes missed by both the court and the opponent’s lawyer.
Guyer’s lawyer, Denis Quinn, agreed, saying that his client was “incredible remorse” for an error and that his regret for the incident would ensure “that he no longer does.”
Ai, artificial intelligence, robot and human hands touch and connect, unity with the concept of human and AI, machine learning and background of futuristic technology (East)
Lawyers attach to AI potential that court cases attended false evidence
The submission of the application was related to the case in which Guyer’s client Karen Iovino claimed that she faced the retaliation of the employer Michael Stapleton Associates, and “was discharged for reporting alleged issues on MSA -es -es -State Department of Inspector’s Office.”
IN August submissionGuyer denied by citing “fabricated” cases “and said that cases were actually existed, but that they were wrongly quoted and made a mistake Generative AI.
“GPT -I generate great for great legal arguments,” Guyer wrote in separate declarationsaying that the mistakes created Claude 3 Opus Atrophic Inc., which is one of several a tools that Guyer says he uses.
“I use a package of generative AI technology for legal research and writing, and GPT legal briefing,” Guyer said.
The inside of an empty court with a hammer and a sound block on the table. (East)
Click here to get the Fox News app
State Attorney Virginia opened an investigation into it, and Guyer, who was licensed in Oregon, applied at the Oregon Bar. Judge Cullen says he hopes his opinion will help inform probes, however, there has been no development of any lawyer’s chamber.
