“The match referee should …”- Kevin Pietersen Harps on Harshit Wound for Shid DuBe need to replace saga

Former Kripket Kevin Pietersen is still upset about the controversy of replacement for the brain earthquake in the fourth T20i current series between India and England. Kevin Pietersen said England had lost the match over the mistake in Gate, but the match referee made the wrong decision regarding the replacement.

Shimitam Duba hit the helmet in the finals through the Indian inserts. The left dough was later replaced after the brain earthquake held. The arm with his right hand was brought to the wound as a replacement for the other half of the match and made an influence by taking three shots in full.

India beat England for 15 rides in the fourth T20I to ensure a 3-1 series win

On Friday, January 31, India defeated England in the fourth T20I in the fourth T20I, securing a 3-1 series with one match. The controversy broke out with Harshit’s wound by replacement for Shium Dube because it was not a replacement “similar”. Jos Buttler also refused to accept that it was a similar replacement.

Duba is a dough and a wound specialist pacer. Former English players Nick Knight and Alastair Cook also criticized officials for approving replacement. However, a team leading to Jos Buttler will hope for a comforting victory, which will be held in Mumbai on Sunday, before going to ODO.

Earthquake SUB is quite the topic everywhere here – Kevin Pietersen

Speaking in front of the fifth and last T20I between India and England, Kevin Pietersen said that the replacement was not a replacement “similar” and added that the judge should be acknowledged by a mistake. He added that the problem should be closed and the focus should switch to the next game.

“The brain earthquake is quite a topic everywhere here, and my view is … it was never a similar replacement, and the match judge should only raise his hand and say that he was wrong. The end of the event for good and we move on to another major conflict tonight tonight “, wrote Kevin Pietersen on X (previously known as Twitter).

The SUB earthquake is quite the topic everywhere here, and my view is … he was never similar to replacement, and the match judge should just raise his hand and say that he is wrong.
The end of the event forever and we move on to another great conflict this evening. 💫

– Kevin Pietersen🦏 (@KP24) 2. February 2025

The argument would go that way – Sanjay Manjrekar

Former Indian Dough Sanja Manjrekar admitted that India was able to persuade officials, claiming that they needed a bowler as a replacement because they planned to use depths for four adds. Manjrekar emphasized that India effectively carried out its case, which led to the approval of the decision.

“Whether he is exactly similar, he is not sure. Everyone outside would know that Shimam Dubu is not similar to the charm of the wound. But India could present the case, which they had to do to confirm the officials,” he said as he talked on ESPNCICINFO.

“The argument would go in such a way that India would say that we plan to use the depths for four adds and we lost his services because of the earthquake problem and we want a bowler for that,” he added.

Also read: International Pension Virat Kohli-Rohit Sharma on cards? Gautam Gambhir provides update