While Israel and we are aligned on the gauze, the Arabic plan leaves problems with no response

When President Trump said last month that he wanted to Move all gauze approximately two million inhabitants from the railway to Egypt and Jordan and transform the territory of “Riviera” on the beach for tourism, the pressure was on Arab leaders horrified by the idea think of your own big plan.

At the Arab Summit in Cairo on Tuesday, they threw out his vision: Renew the gauze without expelling the Palestinians who live there. Sideline Hamas, an armed group who currently controls Gaza, and appoints a committee of qualified bureaucrats who will run a lane six months before handing over the authorities to the internationally recognized Palestinian government on the west coast. Then reunite the territory with the west coast as one Palestinian state-Dutch San Palestinians and many Arabs across the Middle East.

For all the conversations about statehood and nuts, discussions on temporary residential units for Palestine, however, Gaza’s post -war future looks closer to resolution.

While the Arab countries presented a unique front against the idea of ​​forcibly displacing Palestinians and a detailed draft reconstruction of $ 53 billion, their plan leaves the central questions unanswered. And the Arabs have a small influence that they can use to push Israel or Hamas to break their stack on several key questions, especially since Trump’s administration is open in accordance with Israel.

“With all respect, the plan was very technically, as if it was coming from engineering consultation,” said Ghassan Khatib, a political scientist at Birzeit University on the West Coast. “And we need a political plan.”

But the political solution has never been in Arabic hands. Finally, this must come from Israel, Hamas and the United States, analysts said. The three of them remain in the back, raising the fears that the fighting will explode again In Gaza.

The inability of Arab countries to bridge this division was on a visible representation in a statement on Tuesday. Smaller tickets of the way than a wish list, the proposal skipped that power in Gaza would be transferred from the post -war Board of Directors to the Palestinian administration and reiterated that the Palestinians must be approved to their country, which is the possibility that the Israeli government has had a hard -to -rejected right.

The statement that Arab countries signed on Tuesday night also escaped directly by resolving whether or how to disarm Hamas, which is a key question. While both Israel and Trump’s administration say that the dismantling of the armed wing of the group cannot be determined because of the threat it represents to Israel, demilitarization is a hamas switch.

The farthest document is a sloping reference to a gauze managed by one armed force and a unique legitimate authority. Otherwise, it calls for the Palestinian authority to manage Gaza in the future with the west coast, which implies to be the authority in charge of security, not Hamas.

This does not mean that Arab countries want to see Hamas holding a weapon. Egypt, who hosted an emergency reference and borders Gaza in the south, has a serious concern for national security against Hamas. Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and some other Arab countries also want to see that they are gone.

However, even if they were united at the need to demilitarize Hamas, it seems that no one has a plan for how to do it or who would spend it. The group, which welcomed the statement on Tuesday, expressed no openness to giving up weapons.

Another fundamental arrest is focused on the issue of Palestinian statehood. The calls of Arab countries to establish the Palestinian state are almost sure that they will move to Israeli complaints.

Arab leaders say that the conversion of Mr. Trump’s “Gaza Riviera” would mean destroying any appearance of the Palestinian state. Israel accepted the proposal, with the Israeli Foreign Ministry saying on X on Tuesday night That Mr. Trump’s idea was “an opportunity for Gazans to have a free choice based on their free will. That should be encouraged!”

It seems that the spokesman for Trump’s administration, Brian Hughes, was on the idea of ​​the US president when asked about the Arabic plan on Tuesday night, saying that the Arabic plan “was not involved in the reality that Gaza was currently uninhabited,” Reuters said.

Although the United States did not explicitly abolish their decade, the old support for the decision of the conflict with the two countries, Trump’s administration seems to be moving with Israel in many issues, asking questions about its commitment to Palestinian statehood. Israel, however, is also largely dependent on the United States, which Mr. Trump gives a room to twist the hands of Israel, analysts said.

“The only thing that is really important at this point is what Trump will suggest?” said Paul Salem, an expert based in Washington, headquartered in Washington.

Mr. Trump has a view of a big shot in which Saudi Arabia would agree to normalize relations with Israel in exchange for a security pact with the United States. Saudi Arabia conditioned any job in achieving Palestinian statehood, damping the odds of the agreement.

But with the break up of fire in gauze robbery And Israel tightening his grip On the West coast, Mr. Salem said that the Palestinians were in such a weakened position that Mr. Trump could force the contract.

“They could be able to accept things they might not accept,” Mr. Salem said.

The Arab draft set on Tuesday is the most prominent when it comes to gauze renewal, a procedure for which a document says it could last until 2030 and cost $ 53 billion. Next month, she is looking for a conference to mobilize international financing and investment for the plan, but it is unclear who will put the money.

The rich Gulf Arab states are often invited to pay for renewal and development throughout the Arab world. The Egyptian Foreign Minister, Badr Abdelatty, also suggested that Europe could be involved; and António Costa, president of the European Council, who brings together European Union leaders, said in a speech on the summit on Tuesday that the block “was ready to provide concrete support”.

However, the bay monarchies that will probably have to carry a large part of the law, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, are cautiously spent so much on the renewal of gauze only to destroy the territory again if the war returns.

Only two heads of the country’s bay attended a meeting in Cairo – the leaders of Bahrain and Qatar – who underestimated the strong, united front Egypt were hoped to present and ask questions about the support of the Gulf countries for the plan.