The US Judge wants an explanation of why Trump’s administration deported Venezuelan in the middle of a court order

The US federal judge pressed Trump’s administration on Monday to provide details about hundreds of Venezuelanians, which he deported in spite of the court order he forbade him to do so, and gave the government until Tuesday to explain why officials believed that they had fulfilled his command.

Administration of US President Donald Trump deported more than 200 Venezuelanians It is claimed that members of the DE ARAGUA, a Venecuelan gang, are related to the abduction, extortion and murder of the contract, with El Salvador over the weekend, even when Judge James Boasberg temporarily blocked him to use the war to implement deportation.

Boasberg had previously sent the Government to provide details about the time of flights that were transported by Venezuela to El Salvador, including whether they had taken off after his command was issued.

The government lawyer for the administration response during the hearing on Monday was surface.

“Why do you show yourself today without an answer?” Boasberg asked.

The hearing was followed by the Government’s request to remove the judge from the case. Trump’s administration has challenged historical checks and balance between American branches of government.

Ever since he assumed his duty in January, Trump has sought to push the executive borders, reducing the consumption authorized by the Congress, the removal agency and the release of thousands of federal workers.

Emergency session on weekend

The session on Monday encouraged an emergency hearing on Saturday, in which the American Union of Civil Freedom asked Boasberg to issue a two -week temporary block on Trumpovo Using an alien enemy law from 1798 to carry out deportations.

On Sunday, the White House claimed that the federal courts were not in charge of Trump’s authority to expel foreign enemies under the 18th -century law, which is historically used only in war times, although it also said it was in accordance with the order.

In the court’s submission, shortly before the hearing on Monday, Trump’s administration said that the Directive’s Directive had been uttered on Saturday to return any planes that carry migrants “is not stated” because it was not in a written order.

The administration announced that it did not break Boasberg’s next order prohibiting the immigration authorities to remove migrants because the aircraft had already left when they were issued.

But the judge said in court that he still wanted to know when flights went, where they were going, when they left the airspace and when they landed on the foreign country. He also asked when individuals were transferred to foreign custody.

“There are a lot of operational national security and external relations at risk,” said Abhishek Kampbla, lawyer of the Ministry of Justice, explaining why Trump’s administration was resistant to information sharing.

On Tuesday, Boasberg ordered the Government by noon to provide details such as the time of departure and arrival in foreign countries, the number of people deported and why the Government did not believe that this information could be published.

Boasberg did not say if the government had violated his orders from Saturday.

The judge sometimes seemed skeptical about the explanation of Trump’s administration because he did not return planes to the US, repeatedly pressed Kambla, who repeatedly said that there were things he could not share publicly.

‘Borders on absurd’

Some legal experts have said that the aircraft location in the air is irrelevant.

Michael J. Gerhardt, a professor of constitutional law at the Faculty of Law, University of North Carolina, said that the argument was “bordering absurd” and that “contrary to a well -resolved Constitutional Law”, which holds that federal officials are subject to the Constitution no matter where they are.

“Government plane for Government’s business is not in a zone without a law,” Gerhardt said, adding: “If this is not the case, the Government can simply do whatever it obviously wants to do as long as it no longer operates on American soil.”

Since the Congress under the control of the Republicans mostly supported their agenda, the federal judges were often the only limit of his executive actions, which put many on hold as they consider their legality. In some cases, the advocacy groups said that the administration rejected in accordance with the judicial orders.

Trump’s administration differently described the deported Venezuela as a gang members, “monsters” or “alien terrorists”, but did not provide evidence for supporting its claims.

The Karolina Leavitt White House secretary said a total of 261 people were deported, including 137 who were removed according to the Law on Almise Enemies and more than 100 others that were removed by the standard immigration procedure. There were also 23 members of the Salvadoran Gang MS-13, Leavitt said.

Trump’s administration also found herself defended her actions in deporting Rhode Island by Lebanon last week.

US authorities said on Monday that they were deported by Dr. Rasha Alawieh after discovering the “cute photos and videos” of the former longtime leader of Hezbollah and the militants in the folder of the deleted objects of her cellphone.

Alawieh also told agents that she attended a funeral last month in Lebanon Hezbollah’s killed leader Hassan Nasrallahwho was supported by a “religious perspective” as a Shiite Muslim.

The justice department provided these details because he sought to secure a federal judge in Boston that the US customs and the protection of the border did not intentionally disrespect the order he had issued on Friday, which was supposed to stop Alawieh’s immediate removal.