The director of NY Times editorial is to blame the immigration policy for democratic loss

In an interview with New Yorker, the editorial director of the New York Times of the opinion, he opposed the immigration policy of former President Joe Biden, saying that “never what most US voters wanted.”
David Leonhardt, who has been managing Times’s “Morning” Bulletin for the last five years, said to New York’s Isaac Chotiner that the historically light immigration standards of Biden were one of the first three reasons why the Democratic Party lost the election for 2024. President Donald Trump.
“It was unpopular from the beginning. And that happened in large part – not exclusively, but in large part – because of the policies they brought,” Leonhardt said.
Governors DEM -AI GOP u call Trump to ‘release states play a role’ in immigration decisions
The editorial director of the New York Times Minity section wrote that most Americans opposed the immigration policy of former President Biden. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Like Leonhardt logged in to the New York Times In December, in the years 2021 to 2023, there was the largest tempo arrival of migrants in the United States in the history of the whole country.
“Annual net migration – the number of people coming to the country, diminished to leave the number – an average of 2.4 million people from 2021 to 2023, according to the Congress Budget Office. The total net migration during the Biden administration is likely to exceed eight million people,” Leonhardt wrote, adding about 60 percent of these migrants illegally.
In an interview with New Yorker, Leonhardt cited this influx of immigrants, along with Biden’s age and inflation, as the main reasons that former Vice President Kamala Harris did not win.
“We also had the biggest rush of immigration in the short period of American history under the President of Biden. The pace was even faster than the top pace of Ellis Island, the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,” he said, echoing what he wrote in the previous months.
States returns against the “shrine” resistance as they gather around Trump’s efforts to deport
Former President Biden monitored the biggest rush of immigration in American history. (Biden Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images, Migrant Caravan Photo by Jose Torres/Anadolo via Getty Images)
“We had eight million net immigrants who entered the country. It seems that about five million have entered illegally, which is a much faster pace than under Trump or Obama.”
He admitted that Biden was looking for this immigration records, saying to New Yorker that Biden says during the 2020 campaign that he “wants more people to come to the country.” Then he once began to “loose the whole crowd of politics” once on duty.
“Almost immediately, the immigration has grown,” the journalist said, noting that “she never wanted most US voters. This was especially not what the voters with lower revenue via the races wanted.”
Leonhardt said that loose immigration policy is different from former President Barack Obamawho at least kept the importance of border safety and deportation of criminals.
“According to Obama, 2012, it is a really balanced approach. It boasts that the border is safer than at any time of the previous decades. He talks about the deportation of crime that threatens our communities. Also, of course, she says that the nation of immigrants and the need for providing the citizen dreamed and dreamed of that.
Florida Sheriff says that Ice partnership is just the beginning in an illegal migrant burglary
“And by 2020, there is not a single penalty on the immocratic party platform on the immigration Party,” Leonhardt continued, adding that there was no “evidence” on any polls that the Americans supported the rejection of the border safety.
He said Biden pushed politics “to follow the desires of very progressive, mostly wealthy members,” but noted that Obamina “moderation is much more popular than Biden’s more radical position” among voters.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Later in an interview, he stated that the immigration message of the party He should become “one who is more moderate than what the party was and the one who acknowledges the complications that immigration has tremendous benefits for immigrants and the country, but also has significant flaws.”