The competition in which Mark Carney appeared as a leader of the Liberal Party and who will soon be Prime Minister Canada proved to be annoying.
The drama that inevitably led, Carney seems to be convincing crowning On Sunday night, it happened at the end of December last December, when once a reliable commissioner of Prime Minister Justin Trudeauu and a reliable deputy government, Chrystia Freeland, played Judas.
Her surprising resignation, as a finance minister, turned to a wounded and unpopular Prime Minister – inside and outside his motionless MP – through a parliamentary edge, forcing Trudeau to admit obviously: the Canadian prince charmingly was no longer a prince, nor obviously that charming.
Instead, Trudeau considered a loser and responsibility that had to be replaced quickly to save liberals, if possible, from what seemed to be the historical kindness of the Conservative Party chief, Pierre Poilievre.
If Freeland thought that its purpose betrayal would be rewarded and reduced the one -off foreign minister to the Prime Minister’s office, she misjudged.
Many of her cabinet and colleagues left her, who were massively in Carney’s side. Freeland’s humiliation was confirmed when she received just over eight percent of the first ball.
However, I suppose, the liberals will be grateful to freeland for launching Domino events that eventually saved the chances of the parties to continue doing what they believe is their almost divine law: to manage Canada, unobstructed by irritating opposition parties.
Carney’s big and expected victory was not a “re -” liberal party. It was, rather, in accordance with its ruthless tradition of disposing with yesterday’s Habama in favor of tomorrow’s Savior to hold on to his prestigious affairs and, more importantly, power.
Now a new and extraordinary drama will develop. This can represent the most pronounced federal elections in the relatively young history of Canada.
Shortly after sworn in because the Prime Minister, Carney, a former central banker, is expected to visit General Governor Mary Simon and launch a national voice.
The only-maybe the only one that will be banned unexpectedly, to dominate the campaign should be asked as a question: Who will save Canada from San Donald Trump, a dream of an annexation of an American northern neighbor rich in resources, in officially, Union as his 51st state?
Until the imperial design of the US President of the US President came to shocking focus, Poilievre seemed comfortable ready to become a prime minister with most in the form of tsunami.
With its rough signature, for the passage of the passage, Poilievre framed the upcoming election as a choice between the “broken” presence of Canada-which made an exhausted, extraordinary liberal party-and prosperous, even egalitarian future, where “Canadians” could be in Canadian and promise.
It worked.
That is, until Trump returned to the oval office and repaired his oxygen, rigid tariff sights on a “younger partner” who had a-despite repeated and study warnings – Conged to generations, closer to connection with the most powerful economy in the world.
Suddenly political counts have changed, and thus the defining Quadaring with whom Canadians are facing: the question is no longer any future the country will shape, but whether the country has had a future at all.
Seismic shift saw that the popularity of the conservative party and Poilievre fell, while the liberals have resurrected Their wealth for support in life by lambastation of Poilievre’s “angry” division “and painting him as an incompetent and reluctant challenge of his” mentor “-trump.
Carney pressed the stitching house in his speech about accepting.
“The Pierre Poilievre plan will leave us divided and ready to be conquered, because the person who adores the altar of Donald Trump will kneel before him and not stand towards him,” Carney said.
Fair or not, Poilievre gave enough ammunition to his critics to use and use this caustic line of attack.
Poilievre and his shadow cabinet have discovered the practice of the type of charged rhetoric about the characters who are bio-oosim, which are opponents singled out-Gotovo Verbut’s mirror of Trump’s corrosive madness and ugliness.
The recipes of the “repair of” “broken Canada” were also facsimil of Trump’s isolated, “American first” scenario-to-be fencing on “Government’s size and waste”, to reduce immigration, reward “hard work”, while parting “a state of benefits”, demonized printing and pressed “predominance” and “full” and “extinguished”.
“Timbit Trump”-like the poiliever’s threatening lately to describe him-a tangible expression of his attraction and affinity for politics in Trump’s style when he celebrated the occupation of the Canadian Sedate Capital, Ottawa, the end of the right-wing mob of the Magi-Blag truck that the peoples and peoples, who were in the city.
Try to be able to, by Poilievre, may not be able to shake the indisputable and indisputable associations and relationships – in words, works and temperament – the president who intends to force Canada to capitulate on his whimsicality and the demands of economic coercion.
This already spiky job was stronger in the light of recent public opinion poll This, if it is true, reveals that instead of rejecting Trump’s adventure, an alarming 18 percent of Tory’s supporters, which Poilievre was leading, admitted that they wanted the Canadian Confederation to fall apart to join the United States as 51.
Of course, Poilievre dismissed the accusations that Trump’s obedient poodles and conservatives are launched CONFANSIVE TESTERS CARNEY’s loyalty in Canada was addressed.
Conservative TV ads claim that although he was chairman of the Committee of one of the largest Canadian public trading companies, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), Carney approved the transfer of the company from Toronto to Donald Trump’s hometown.
Carney diminished his role in that decision, insisting that he was officially made by the BAM committee after being resigned in January as a chairman.
However, the company’s documents show that the Committee approved the move in October 2024, and the decision was confirmed by the shareholders at the meeting at the end of January.
Liberal momentum may have stopped.
Whoever will prevail will probably determine whether Carney or Poilievre can convince enough Canadians that these are the embodiment of Canada captain in the form of maple leaves.
Although he faces challenges, Poilievre cannot and should not be underestimated. He dedicated a large part of his adult life to his skills to convey a simple, clear message with a convincing measure of belief and honesty.
Carney is not a retail politician. He, by nature and mood, is a technocrat that lacks an attractive ability to combine ordinary speech with a calling dose of affordable charisma.
The Canadian destiny can rest on the outcome of the battle led by Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney because of the soul of an anxiety of nation worried about his core of what follows.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s and do not reflect the editorial position of Al Jazeere.
