President Donald Trump wants ‘activist’ groups that sue the Government to invest money if they lose
First on the fox: President Donald Trump He signed a letter on Thursday by which the heads of government agencies have asked federal judges to require financial guarantees to hold the “activist” groups sued by the Government financially responsible if it is determined that the ban is unnecessary.
The letter comes since Trump’s administration faces more than 90 lawsuits Stepping from executive orders, memorandums and executive announcements issued from January 20 that legal groups, work organizations and other state and local prosecutors are.
In particular, the correspondent indicates the federal agency to coordinate with the head lawyer Pam Bondi Ask that federal courts be followed by the rules downtown by financial guarantees from those who require prohibitions.
Although the federal judges ultimately have the final word of whether these financial guarantees are required, the Ministry of Justice may request under the federal rule of civil proceedings 65 (c) that judges conduct the rule of demanding financial guarantees from prosecutors who are equal to potential costs and damage that would be federal government from the wrong preliminary commands or temporary limitations of the order.
Scotus rules nearly $ 2 billion for frozen USAIDs payments
The White House orders the Pam Bonda Attorney General to ask the judge to follow the rule that would require financial guarantees from the prosecutor seeking prohibitions. (Associated Press)
Memo signed on Thursday is applied to all lawsuits seeking preliminary prohibitions or temporary limit commands “where the Government may show financial damage from the required relief,” the fact of the White House said.
“Agencies must justify safety amounts on the basis of explained assessment of damage, ensuring that the courts deny or dissolve prohibitions if prosecutors do not pay, absent good reason,” the white house said in the fact of the Fox News Digital.
As a result, the White House said that the command would rule in “activist judges” and that “the litigation be responsible”.
“The unprecedented judges of the district issued prohibitions outside their powers, inserting into executive policies and stopping by policies that supported the voters,” said the White House in its fact.
The lawsuits that challenged Trump’s administration have already begun to break through to the Supreme Court. For example, the High Court rendered a 5-4 verdict on Wednesday, in favor of a district judge commanding Trump’s administration to pay almost $ 2 billion in foreign assistance.
The Supreme Court said it was, from the deadline of the district court on February 26 for Trump’s administration to pay the USAID financing contracts, it expired that the case returned to a lower court to draw future payment plans.
Trump is temporarily prevented from reaching a mission to finish USAID
The Supreme Court confirmed the verdict of the District Judge March 5, 2025, which would have demanded that Trump’s administration be paid almost $ 2 billion in foreign assistance. (Anna Moneymaker)
“Given that the deadline in the disputed order has now been adopted, as given the current procedures of the preliminary prohibition, the district court should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill in order to ensure the respect of the temporary restraint order, with due respect to the feasibility of any deadlines,” the court said.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Fox News’ Kerri Urbahn and Breanne Depisch contributed to this report.
