AND The Prophet Georgia State And his lawyer expressed during the hearing on Wednesday that the Fulton Fani Fani district Fani Willis district was arrested for flicting court calls and still an option, although they missed it that they would still take the action.
The Senate Senate Senate Committee had its lawyer Josha Belinfante, he provided an update about the months of return and in the courts of Is Willis’s lawyers about calling for documents relating to her investigation by President Donald Trump for allegedly interfering with the election, as well as another testimony subponee.
Willis challenged a court call from September 3, 2024, but the court ruled that the calls were legitimate.
Fani Willis ordered to pay $ 54,000 to violate the Law on Open Records in the Trump case
Committee Chairman Senator Bill Coswert instructed Belinfante to re -reach Wade’s advisor and “propose either Thursday or Friday at the beginning of the last week of April or the first two weeks of May.”
Fani Willis District Prosecutor testifies during hearing in Georgia’s case against Donald John Trump in the courtyard of the Fulton District in Atlanta on February 15, 2024. (Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Images)
“And if he will agree to the date, then we will issue a court call and I think he will honor his word. If not, we will have a completely different problem,” he said. “And the same thing on the documents, just say that we have achieved the end of our path. We need them until April 15. You have already agreed to give them to us, and if they say they will not, we will have to round up with you.”
Senator Steve Gooch asked what would usually happen if a district state prosecutor, like Willis, issued a court invitation for someone to appear in court and whether that person neglected to appear.
“This person could be kept in criminal contempt,” Belinfante said.
“Arrested?” Gooch asked. The lawyer replied, “It could be.”
Members, including Senator Greg Dolezal, emphasized that the Committee was already awarded as Willis challenged their calls and the court supported them and then re -challenged them.
Special prosecutor Nathan Wade sits in court during the Georgia Listening case against Donald John Trump in the courtyard of the Fulton County in Atlanta on March 1, 2024. (Alex Slitz-Pool/Getty Images)
“If she had inserted her nose in this committee, she put her nose at the Open Law on Record Georgia, and I only have limited confidence to behave in good faith. So, I believe we may be in place that we should escalate it to the next step,” he said.
The hearing comes because the Daily Mail received photos of Willis and a former special prosecutor in Trump’s case Nathan Wade, who traveled together at the Los Angeles airport.
“What is our legal obligation to show respect for her personal schedule of travel?” Said Dolezal.
“There is no one,” Belifante said.
Photo to reservation Donald Trump (Sheriff of the Fulton County Office via AP)
Dolezal said that the courts, in a separate case of open records, called her office “openly hostile” and “significantly unfounded and awful.” “I think we have an individual here who thinks she is above the law, and I do not think that people from Georgia want this committee waiting to decide to want to appear on the basis of his trip schedule with Mr. Wade, otherwise her trip schedule,” he said.
Belifante said that in December, as repeated judges had pulled themselves out of the case and that he was transferred to another county, the committee assured Willis that he would not send a sergeant to a weapon or consider contempt. But since then, months have passed.
Belifante said that Willis’s lawyer told him that her “trip schedule” meant that he would not be available to testify by the end of April or May. The lawyer testified that some of the documents that the Committee asks for that Willis has already handed over to the US House of Representatives and the appellant’s court, and her lawyer has no further legal avenue to appeal to the court call.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“It has expired and there is currently no attraction order because we have arrived [an] deal with them. Nothing can complain about previous documents. This is controversial because there is that agreement, “Belifante said.” On the witness, we think that they have given up the argument a long time ago, and so that the weather is gone, and even then, both superior courts should decide whether to allow the appeal to continue, but that time disappears. There is currently no final order. “
