NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Report from February 2025. Palisades Research Ai of disintegration models The moral compass is missing. They will cheat to achieve their goals. The so -called large linguistic models (LLMS) will misplain the degree in which they were aligned with social norms.
None of this should be surprising. Twenty years ago Nick Bostra set up a thought experiment in which Ai asked The most effective manufacture of paper clips. Given the mandate and the agency, he would eventually destroy all life for the production of paper clips.
Isaac Asimov saw that it was coming in his “I, Robot” The stories they consider in order for the “harmonized” robotic brain to be able to go evil in ways that harm people.
The moral/ethical context within which the AI of resonation models operate is miserable. (Getty Images)
One notable example, the story of “Ranaround” puts a tool for a robot mining on the Mercury planet. Two people on the planet need to do this if they will return home. But the robot is caught between demand to follow commands and demands to preserve. As a result, it circulates around the unattainable minerals, unaware that in a large picture, he ignores his first command for the preservation of human life.
The upcoming economy for unemployed AI: Who will pay taxes?
And the big picture is a problem here. The moral/ethical context within which the AI of resonation models operate is miserable. His context includes written rules of the game. It does not include all unwritten rules, such as the fact that you should not manipulate your opponent. Or that you should not lie to protect your own observed interests.
Even the context of the AI model of reasoning may include countless moral considerations that are expanded from any decision made by a man or AI. Because The ethics is difficultThe more complex the situation, the harder it is. There is no “you” and no “I”. There is only a quick, process and answer.
So, “Do to others …” really fails.
Ai transforms the job. This is how we stay in front of China
In people a A moral compass was developed Through socialization, to be with other people. It is an imperfect procedure. However, this has so far allowed us to live in huge, diverse and extremely complex societies without destroying ourselves
The moral compass develops slowly. People have been needed for years from infants to adults to develop a strong sense of ethics. And many still barely get it and are a constant danger to their colleagues. They had to have had a morale to develop people who correspond to our ability to destroy and self -destruction. Only the rules of the game never function. Ask Moses, or Muhammad, Jesus, Bio, Confucius and Mencius, or Aristotle.
Could it even be able to explain the effects of their actions on thousands of people and societies in different situations? Can this explain this a complex natural environment that we all depend on? Currently, it cannot be best distinguished by fair and cheating. And how could they? Righteousness cannot be reduced to a rule.
Ai can’t wait: Why do we need a speed to win
You might remember the experiments showing that Capuchin monkeys rejected what seemed like a “unequal salary” to do the same task? Because of this, they develop significantly from any Ai when it comes to morality.
It is honest to see how Ai can give such a sense of morality that has no socialization and continuation of evolution for which current models do not have the ability to absent human training. And even then, they are trained, not formed. They do not become moral, they only learn more rules.
This does not make it worthless. It has a huge capacity for good. But that Does AI make up dangerous. Therefore, it requires ethical people to create guidelines that we would create for any dangerous technology. We don’t need a race according to Ai anarchy.
Click here for more Fox News opinions
For this comment I had a bite, one fully based on public events. But after thinking, I realized two things: first, to use someone’s tragedy for my moment of lowering the microphone; And secondly, so that those involved may be hurt. I dropped him.
It is unethical to use the pain and suffering of others to improve their own interest. It’s something that people, at least most of us, know. This is something Ai can never understand.
