A drop in gas tax revenue exacerbated by EV mandates, says an expert

As gas tax revenues are reduced, several countries are trying to finance the basic repair of infrastructure – the crisis is exacerbated by pure air mandates that push car manufacturers according to electric vehicles, according to an energy policy expert.

States are primarily used Gas tax revenues To finance the maintenance of infrastructure, such as bridges and roads. In Oregon, a state with aggressive climatic goals, the Ministry of Transport envisaged that it would face an estimated shortage of budget in the amount of $ 350 million, partly due to the drop in gas tax revenue. California, which requires a car manufacturer to sell a certain percentage of vehicles without zero, observes a potential loss of $ 5 billion in the next decade-and 64%in the next decade.

Jason Isaac is the founder and director of the US Institute of Energy, a trade organization that represents mostly oil and gas companies. Fox News Digital said that the states were losing around $ 2,506 in gas revenue with gas tax on each EV sold. Isaac said that, in his opinion, strict EV mandators exacerbate the lack of gas tax revenue.

Dogs are the legislators view the anemic course of Defenda Biden 3b EV postal truck ‘Boondogle’

” the regulations and requirements of the Federal Government In order for car manufacturers to make and sell electric vehicles, they deeply influence the collection of revenue for the state and the federal government for financing our highway infrastructure, “Isaac said.

In particular, he pointed to the recessing requirements of the fuel of clean rays.

“The car manufacturers lose billions of dollars earning EV. The only company that earns the sale of EVS is Tesla and make money because they sell loans for the fuel emissions to other car manufacturers,” Isaac said. “Tesla would only break, maybe a little profit, had it not been for the sale of Ford and GM loan, Stellantis and other car manufacturers forced to buy fuel savings for the federal government’s demand.”

As a result, Isaac said, car manufacturers are forced to make more electric vehicles In an effort to be ongoing with government mandates.

“It really destroys the market,” he said.

EPA administrator returns 31 regulations from the Biden era

In the meantime, Isaac posed, the mandate of the economy of fuel and the permanent system of return customer created “the market of more billion dollars from nothing that improves the fuel economy.”

“There is a two -sided support to get rid of these loans,” he said, adding that the move will help car manufacturers rely on the system “to return and truly improve fuel savings and vehicles, because they will not spend billions of dollars from vehicles that people just do not want.

According to McKinsey & Co. 2024. Pulse of consumer mobility, 46% of EV owners in the United States said that “very” is likely to switch to the gas-on-gas vehicle in the next purchase, mainly due to the lack of restriction of infrastructure for filling and range.

The study revealed that US exports of gas did not affect climate change, so the biden administrator buried, the officials say

The Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced this month to begin the process of returning the caring of pollution and economy of fuel set under former President Joe Biden, part of the wider initiative to peel off the initiative for green energy. In January, President Donald Trump The traffic secretary, Sean Duffy, also issued a command that directed the regulators to review the current corporate average fuel or cafes.

Click here to get the Fox News app

States are considering different solutions to supplement their income from lost gas tax, including the cost of using roads based on kilometers, taxes on EV billing cells and increased registration fees for EVS. A debate on the increase in the federal gas tax – which has not increased since 1993 – has not increased – as a potential solution.

Isaac said that, with the change of federal fuel economy standards, he noted that the raising of registration for EVS was a good solution. He said that putting tax on electric vehicle filling cells is unlikely to create enough means to make up for the lost revenue.

Isaac also claimed that he was not very in charge of implementing travel taxes at miles. He suggested that it could serve as a “regressive” tax on people with a lower income struggling with housing costs, as they will have to move from urban areas to rural or suburban areas, increasing the amount of kilometers they need for the job and other activities.

Isaac is not an advocate of raising federal gas tax.

“We don’t need to increase taxes, we just need to spend our dollars more effectively,” Isaac said. “I mean Doga will help With this efficiency, so dollars truly allow our country’s infrastructure to maintain the infrastructure. “