President Donald Trump He signed an executive command (EO) to limit “chemical and surgical” procedures to change gender for minors, which prompted both return and applause. Now medical experts and destructive are separated to its consequences.
Eo,, entitled “The Protection of Children from Chemical and Surgical Relays”, she has carried out changes to the federal government policies regarding financing and sponsorship of operations and procedures of sexual change.
“The policy of the United States will not finance, sponsor, promote, assist or support the so -called” transition “of a child from one sex to another,” the EO states.
Administration, in the orderThey stated that throughout the United States, medical professionals “mourn and sterilize an increasing number of impressive children under radical and false claim that adults can change their child’s gender through a number of irreversible medical interventions.”
“The myriad of children soon regrets being crippled and began to realize a terrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children breastfeeding,” the executive order said. “Moreover, the medical accounts of these vulnerable young people can increase throughout their lives because they are often trapped lifelong medical complicationsa losing war with your own bodies and, tragically, sterilization. “
Dr. Marc Siegel, A senior medical analyst for Fox News said Eo is now leading in the direction of other countries, including the UK and most of the European Union. Siegel said that his concern was regarding the dreaded political ideology and his leading principle as a doctor to “do not harm.”
Eo states that the Federal Government will no longer finance and sponsor the operations and procedures for changing sex for minors. ((Saul Young /Knoxville News-Sentinel /USA Today)))
“You have a child, has a gender confusion. Did they get enough mental health counseling? Did they get the opportunity to develop? Did they politically put it under pressure someone in society, their parents? And then, most importantly, is that Intervention that leads to something that is not reversible?
Siegel interrupted treatments that will be forbidden to minors, including puberty blockages and surgery, under the EO.
“Puberty blockers are the main Lupron, which we use for prostate cancer, he said enough,” Siegel said. “I mean, it interferes with bone growth, it can potentially interfere with fertility if it is combined with hormones and can interfere with thinking and cognition. I do not believe we can say that puberty hormone blockers do not have a long term side effects, they do it.”
“Operation, we’re talking about mastectomy, we’re talking about the upper and lower operations. I think it’s something that is not reversible and that should never be done on the children,” he added. “The advocates of this will say,” So the longer you wait, the more child suffers. “I think there are conflicting research on this.
Detransioner and activist Chloe Cole, who went through her Medical gender transition At the age of 12 to 16, Lupron began to take Lupron at the age of 13, then testosterone as a replacement hormone for hormone it did not produce.
“At the age of 15, I am undergoing radical double mastectomy, which is usually reserved for breast cancer patients or have breast cancer gene,” Cole told Fox News Digital. “But I didn’t have either, and this was not ordinary mastectomy … and the reconstruction is not a guarantee for every patient, because this has never been done with that in mind.”
“Obviously, this caused great damage to my body and threatened my health not only at that time, but left me lasting health effects,” she added. “I am now 20, almost 21 years, and it’s been 4 or 5 years since I’ve been on everything and I’ve gone through everything, and it’s likely to affect me all my life.”
Siegal said he did not take the same attitude when it came to adults. But when it comes to minors, “I don’t even have to see someone who says,” I wish I had my breasts “to know it’s wrong,” he said.
Six Service members dispute Trump’s transgender military executive order
Detranzioner and activist Chloe Cole outside the Supreme Court building during oral arguments in the case of the Kljetti against the USA, December 4, 2024. (Fox News Digital)
“I think this is a wrong thing for many reasons, one of whom is at that age is not really in the right space to make that decision already,” he added. “Some countries allow it without parental approval, but I don’t think it should be done with parental approval.”
Cole said that Eo was “incredibly exciting news” because it was the first attempt at the Federal Government to break “abuse of medical ideology against children,” but reiterated that many people misinterpret the EO as a ban.
“It’s not and doesn’t address the private institutions that perform them,” she said. “But it is an incredible first step in solving it at a federal level and it will make a way for other, larger interventions at the federal level.”
People who claim that children cannot live without these treatments because they are forced to go through puberty and that they will ultimately face the life of an accident, Cole said “they assume that transgender identity is innate.”
“When you allow these children to grow up without any intervention and without confirmation of their transgender identity, but take them in other ways to adults through their identity, and then almost every time they will give up,” she said. “In the end, they will reintegrate with their bodies, become comfortable with him and will reject a transgender identity.”
“What is the screenplay of the best case, because allowing your child to go this time, you basically guarantee them the life of sterility, health problems and slavery in the pharmaceutical and health industry,” she added. “They will depend on the drugs and surgery operations, potentially for life.”
But some experts disagree. Erica Anderson, a transgender clinical psychologist, said Fox News Digital that eo includes some “inflammatory language” used to evoke certain connotations.
“She is too extreme and does not reveal any subtlety, there is no appreciation for the complications that will follow the fact that there are several people in a society that will push back,” Anderson said. “I never advocated the bans, I was an advocate of caution and I was worried about the public population that affected such orders.”
“The idea that you could bring back what happened to the presidential command, although the powerful idea, it is harder to achieve in a practical sense than I think anyone may understand at the federal level,” Anderson added.
ACLU a lawyer calls a woman “non-transger woman” in a rant about Trump’s executive order
Anderson had previously sounded an alarm because of an American approach to medical and social treatment for children who experience gender dysphoria. (By the kindness of Eric Anderson)
Anderson, who sounded alarm about the approach of colleagues who confirmed medical and social treatment for gender dysphoria among children and teenagers in the US in recent years, Fox News Digital said earlier It should be taken into account that problems with mental health such as the history of abuse, developmental problems, anxiety or depression.
It is significant that eo also abolishes all policies that rely on the guidelines of the World Professional Transgender Health Association (WPATH), which have considered progressive groups in recent years to consider the northern star of transgender care. Within 90 days, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is in charge of publishing an overview of the existing literature on the best practices for promoting the health of children who claim that gender dysphoria, gender dysphoria in fast work or other confusion was based on identity.
“My observations are our status quo does not serve us well,” Anderson said. “There were excesses of people who advocated an unbridled approach to all kinds of accommodation for people who distinguish gender.”
“I opposed it,” Anderson added. “I also opposed direct prohibitions … so I don’t have a simple solution … This is like taking the ax instead of a scalpel into a problem and I don’t advocate for it.”
Cole said Trump Eo is not the end of the fight, although the decline movement has made a lot of progress in recent years.
“We are still only at the end of our battle at the end of our battle and there is so much more progress that we have to achieve until we ensure that no child in the US will never go through this,” she said. “Because this fight only ends when children no longer abuse on our soil. Ever.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments Last month, in December, he challenged the law in Tennessee, which forbids transgender medical treatments for children. The decision in the case of a high profile is expected by July 2025. Over two tenths of the countries have brought similar bannings that limit minors in access to transgender medical treatment.
Fox News’ Louis Casiano and Alexa Moutevelis contributed to this report.
