Trump’s administration regrets the command of the federal federal financing judge at the appellant’s court of the United States for the first round.
The proposal comes several hours after the federal judge from Rhode Island ordered the president Donald Trump Federal funding administration once again, claiming that the administration did not adhere to its previous orders to do so.
US District Judge John McConnell submitted a new proposal on Monday to be ordered by Trump’s administration to comply with the limiting order issued on January 31, temporarily blocking the efforts of administration to stop federal scholarships and loans.
The McConnell -I original limit order followed after 22 countries, and the Columbia District has challenged the actions of Trump’s administration to receive support funds such as aid for reducing pollution by climate pollution and other Environmental Protection Agency programs. But the states said on Friday that the administration did not follow and the funds were still related.
“Any executive command will be endured in court because every action of the Trump van of administration is completely legal,” said Harrison Fields, a white house spokesman, in a Fox News statement. “Every legal challenge against this is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people.
The Office for Management and Budget published a letter 27 January, announcing plans to publish a temporary break with federal scholarships and loans. While the White House later abolished the Memorandum on January 29, the secretary of the Karolina Leavitt White House printing said that the move did not equalize “reciting federal freezing of funds”.
Specifically, McConnel’s proposal calls on Trump’s administration to renew the detained funds appropriated in the Law on Infrastructure Improvement and the Jobs and the Law on Reducing Inflation, which was adopted during the 2021 and 2022 Administration Administration. The request also invites Trump’s administration to restore the financing of institutes such as the National Health Institutes.
Trump’s administration presented the Office for Management and Budget on January 27, ordering a break on federal funds and scholarships. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
The request submitted on Monday claims that the states provided evidence that there are still cases where the federal government has “irregularly” frozen funds and failed to distribute appropriate funding.
Although the proposal says that Trump’s administration claims that these actions have been done to “eradicate” fraud, McConnell said that “freezing in force is now the result of a wide categorical order, not a specific finding of possible fraud.”
“The widely categorical and caring freezing of federal funds, as the court established, was probably unconstitutional and inflicted and inflicted irreparable damage to the huge part of this country,” the judge wrote on Monday.
Leavitt returns to the media “uncertainty” of freezing federal financing
The Karolina Leavitt White House secretary speaks during a briefing for journalists at the White House, January 31, 2025 in Washington. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
In his original order, McConnell said the evidence suggests that the abolition of the Memorandum of OMB is “just” to “defeat the jurisdiction of the court”.
As a result, McConnell said on Monday that Trump’s administration must “immediately renew the frozen financing” until the court listens and decides on a preliminary request for ban.
Iceland’s chief lawyer Peter Nero praised McConnell’s verdict and said that the command “confirmed what we had said from the beginning.”
“Now is the time for the administration to come into complete compliance,” Neronha said in a statement on Monday. “This is a land of law. We expect the administration to follow the law. Our office and lawyers in the whole country are ready to pay attention to the actions of this administration that follows, and we will not hesitate to return to court if they do not adhere to.”
Fox News’ Jacqui Heinrich contributed to this report.
