The PREPIATULATION AND SUBSCRIBE OFFICE OFFICE PRINIGIVITIA for staying next season after delaying the rules of the cost of the Squad | Football news
The PREFITS AND SUPPOSITION OF THE PREMIER LEAGUE (PSR) will remain in place for next season.
They had to be replaced by the rules of cost ratios (SCR) in the summer (SCR), but the Premier League clubs agreed at a meeting in London on Thursday to keep PSR at least another season.
PSR limits clubs to losses of £ 105 million over three years, while SCR, which is a sample on the financial rules of UEFA, limits clubs to wear 85 percent of its revenue on football costs.
SCR would also contain “anchor”, limiting how many clubs can spend on players salaries and transfer to five times higher than the revenue that the League Lower Club receives in broadcasting and reward money.
For example, Sheffield United received £ 110m last season. This means that, under SCR, consumption limit would be five times £ 110 million and £ 550 million.
SCR has launched this season as a frame for financial regulation in shadow.
The clubs are expected to wait until they know the outcome of the latest legal challenge by Manchester City for associated rules on the transactions of the parties before voting to adopt SCR.
PFA has also threatened legal procedures if the Premier League adopts “anchor” because they believe it is an anticonic and an effective salary limit.
What are the rules of profit and sustainability of the Premier League (PSR)?
To put it simply, when each Premier League team increases its annual accounts, they can make a loss of no more than £ 105m in the previous three seasons.
It sounds directly, but this would be a very brief explanator if it were so easy. There are quite a few warnings and sub-classles to keep any club on his toes before they can be found in clear or not …
For starters, not all losses are created equal.
Clubs can lose only £ 15 million your own money over three years. So, this is no more than £ 15 million additional on outflows such as transfer fees, players salaries, and, in many cases of clubs, repayment of former managers compared to their TV payments, seasonal tickets, players sales and so on.
All that is above that, to the 105m -pound barrier, must be guaranteed by their owners who buy shares, known as “safe financing”, and the basis means bankruptcy of the club.
In these circumstances, the Premier League requires the clubs to hand over their financial plans for the next two seasons and that they will avoid exceeding the tag.
If any club owner does not feel particularly glittering or cannot find the best part of £ 100m down the sofa, it does not leave a lot of waving room.
Just in case you want to do something extra interesting, there is another rule to remember. For sides that have spent any of the last three seasons in the EFL, the owners can only invest £ 8m for safe financing for those years, leaving a total maximum annual loss of £ 13m for the campaign concerned.
