The judge denies an effort guided by a Democrat to block the reach of reach, stating the lack of proven damage

Federal judge on Tuesday refused to block Elon Musk The effectiveness of the Ministry of Government from access to government data or dismissal of federal employees.

American District Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled that prosecutors-which represented more than a dozen countries that led the democratic, did not show the necessary evidence of the damage caused by Doge’s approach to grant them a temporary restraint order.

Decision Chutkana, appointed Obama, is a blow to General of the general of 14 lawyers who sued last week to temporarily limit Doge’s access to federal staff on government employees.

Prosecutors claimed that the leading role that a Musk had a private citizen, it is a “unlawful delegation of the executive power” and threatened to what they described as a “broad disorder” to employees working on various federal agencies and government contracts.

Doge achieves a great victory in court, has enabled access to data on 3 federal agencies

“There is no greater threat to a democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of one, an unsected individual,” he said a lawsuitfiled by a New Mexico lawyer Raul Torrez.

Arizona lawyers, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington, also joined him in the request.

While Referee Sometimes the sympathetic attitudes that Torrez and other prosecutors brought during the hearing on Monday also suggested that she also suggested that the prosecutors adequately satisfied the high legal standard of “immediate damage” needed for a temporary restraint order.

“The things I hear are really worrying, but I have to have factual records before I betray something,” Chutkan said on Monday.

Tracking lawsuit: a new resistance that fights Trump’s second term through the attack of lawsuits aimed at EOS

The hearing is the latest in growing turbulent urgent lawsuits filed throughout the country, trying to block or limit Doge’s approach to sensitive government data.

Similar legal challenges are played in federal courts across the country, from New York and Maryland to Virginia and DC, and prosecutors cite fear of breach of privacy, release and possible retaliation from Doge.

‘Wasteful and dangerous’: Doge’s five best shocking discoveries

Doge, a mushroom leadership agency was created by an executive order earlier this year. His status of a temporary organization in the White House gives Doge and employees only 18 months to perform their goals of optimization of the Federal Government, simplifying their business and, of course, doing everything at lower costs.

Doge’s wide missionIn combination with the lack of specifics, they caused fresh care of external observers, who questioned that, exactly, the group plans to fill their ambitious optimization goals in such a short time.

But Musk and his allies have lost some time of the race to do so. The past month spent racing to deliver what they see as one of President Donald Trump The biggest promises for the trace of the campaign: reduction of influential federal budgets, aggressively reducing government waste and cracking or putting ice of large parts of federal employees.

The Ministry of Justice, for its part, said on Monday that the Doga staff “Doga” in detail “in detail” employees of the US government who have the right to access government data under the provisions of the Economy Act.

Recent courts in court also stifled Doge’s surgery – allowing them, at least for now, to continue performing their wide surgery.

As Judge Chutkan noted on Monday, only fears and speculation are not enough to reduce the approach to the dogs: prosecutors must be clearly proven, the IS evidence, that their action has fulfilled the difficult state of the test or “irreversible” damage.

Late last week, US District Judge John Bates, appointed George W. Bush, also rejected the request to block Doge to approach the records of three government agencies, writing in their own opinion that prosecutors “did not show a significant likelihood that [DOGE] Not an agency. “

Trump is temporarily prevented from reaching a mission to finish USAID

For prosecutors, Three defeat They have done more and more unclear what, if any, they hope they may have to provide a short -term representative relief.

Prosecutors representing 14 democratic countries argued on Monday that Doge’s wide access to the Agency violates the Clause on the appointment of the US Constitution.

This clause requires that the Cabinet and other high-level leaders in the US government appoint the President and confirm the Senate votes with a majority-long procedure intended to help with the individual veterinarian to be performed in the role in which they were appointed.

They claimed that the “expansive body” assigned to Doge is not “only academic”.

The prosecutors have already said, Musk “reduced billions of dollars from the agency budget, fired the agency staff and, according to his words,” delete “the entire agency.”

Trump “has no constitutional authority to unilaterally dismantle the government,” the general lawyers said. “Neither could he delegate such an expansive authority to an endless, unconfirmed individual.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

While Judge Chutkan seemed to share the prosecutor’s claim that at least some Doge’s actions look “serious and worrying,” she claimed that intentional fear was not enough to approve the request to block their approach immediately.

“You talk about generalized fear,” Doge said about their complaints. “I don’t see that so far.”