Spurs have to “frustrating” Conte flop as soon as possible
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28337/28337fc39b9e865dff5fff235185d2a3a2cf7126" alt=""
Would be fair to say that this season was particularly difficult for Tottenham Hotspur.
Ange Postecoglou’s The foreign devastated seemingly endless flow of injuries to key players, but even then, the fact that 12 were in Premier league and already outside Fa cup and League Cup She is particularly worrying.
This would be said, we would speculate that there is still a significant part of fans who would like the Australian to give more time; As for all his mistakes, he turned what was the Turgenized team that was supposed to look under former boss Antonio Conte, into one of the most exciting teams in the country.
Moreover, while the Italian could lead the club in Champions League Places, he did not seem likely that he would end the silver accessories and was responsible for his honest share on signatures, including one that costs a team of just over £ 4 million per goal.
Conte’s worst spurs sign
So, before we reach the player in question, it is worth watching one of the other bad signatures from Conte’s term, signature of a loan that couldn’t go much worse: Clement Lenglet.
The French central back joined the northern Londonians on a seasonal loan with Possibility of buying in July 2022And while there was an excitement about the agreement at the time, it didn’t take long for it to waste.
Described as “complete and complete responsibility” Journalist Jonathan Johnson A year before his move, former Sevilla star proved to be as much as during a one -year stay in the capital, making it 35 performs over All competitions and 26 in the league, where the club acknowledged stunning 63 goalswhich looks like Total, it won’t even guess Season with all their defensive injuries.
Fortunately, the possibility of buying was not done at the end of the campaign, and Longlet was sent back to Barcelona to join Aston Vili for next season, where he was just him able to make 25 appearances.
However, while the club was fortunately spared to spend millions on The Amral Defender, the same cannot be said for Conte’s worst signing in northern London.
Conte signing cost millions per purpose
When it comes to the worst signature that Conte has made during his time in the hot seat of Spurs, there can only be one answer.
In the summer of 2022, the North London residents decided £ 60 star Richarlison After the campaign in which he scored 11 goals and scored five assists In only 33 games.
Unfortunately, for all involved, two and a half years later, there is no other way to describe the transmission than as a disaster.
All in all, former Watford striker, whom Ally McCoist described as “Frustrating,” he scored only 18 goals and secured nine assists In 80 appearances, which can hardly be described as a value for money with respect to his transfer fee.
Worse, born Nova Venécia Pocher earns £ 90 per weekWhich means that in 137 weeks since he joined the club, the 27-year-old earned around £ 12.33 million, which brings his overall price to the northern London to the eyes of £ 72.33 million.
Finance of Richarlison’s Career Spurs |
|
---|---|
Transmission fee |
£ 60 million |
Pay |
£ 12.33 million |
Total |
£ 72.33 million |
Performances |
80 |
Cost by appearance |
£ 904K |
Goals |
18 |
Cost to the goal |
£ 4 million |
Helping |
9 |
Cost by assistance |
£ 8 |
The inclusion of the goal |
27 |
Cost by the goal of switching on |
£ 2.67 million |
All statistics through transfermartt & & Wages through capology |
So, when we break that number, it comes to £ 904k for phenomena, just over £ 4 million per goal, just over £ 8 million per Assist and around £ 2.67 million per goal, which is a terrible return of the club’s investment.
Ultimately, Richarlison is talented forward, but his time with the Spurs cannot be described as anything other than a huge failure. Therefore, postecoglou and the committee must be resolved as soon as possible.