Man convicted of hate crimes against the Qur’an Burnings in Sweden | News about religion
The verdict against the anti -Islamic Salwan campaign comes to our common day after the murder of a fellow campaign of Salwan Momika.
The Swedish man who publicly defiled and burned copies of the Qur’an was found guilty of hate crimes, a few days after another man was killed with the same accusations.
Salwan sentenced the Stockholm district on Monday, “expressed contempt for the Muslim ethnic group for his religious beliefs on four occasions.”
In his field, he received a suspended sentence and fines for demonstrations in 2023, in which he walked on a copy of the Qur’an and set them on fire while giving derogatory remarks about Muslims.
The court ruled his actions, which inspired Anger and protests In some Muslim countries, he transcended the boundaries of legitimate religious criticism protected as free expression.
The verdict comes less than a week after Namid’s fellow campaign, Iraqi refugee Salwan Momika, was shot In the apartment just before he was supposed to receive his judgment in a parallel case.
No suspect has yet been charged with the murder. Last week, the authorities arrested five people regarding the incident, but later published them.
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said that “foreign power” may have been involved in the shooting.
“I assure you that safety services are deeply involved because there is obviously a risk that there is a connection with a foreign force,” Kristesson said.
The EBBA Busch Deputy Government also condemned the murder, calling it a “threat” to Sweden’s democracy. “She has to encounter the full strength of our society,” she wrote in a post on social media.
The Qur’an Burnsing 2023 made a balance between the right to freedom of speech and the rules of protection of ethnic and religious groups in the main issue for Sweden and other European countries.
The referee who presided over by the Majest Case, Goran Lundahl, said in a statement that he located locally that “expressing opinions on religion does not give a free passage to do or say anything and everything without risking the group of the group holding that belief.”
Namid’s lawyer said he would appeal the verdict.
“My client believes that his statements are a critique of religion, which is covered by freedom of expression,” he said.
