Breaking News

First Open Gay DC Federal Judge Rakes Trump Administrator over a military trans prohibition


The first open gay federal judge at DC spent hours on Tuesday baking Trump’s administration for his attempt to codify the service conditions for Members of transgender services In the US army, seeking to determine the scope of potential damage to the transgender military staff.

It is an executive command 27 January signed by the President Donald Trump Demanding the Ministry of Defense to update its guidelines regarding the “trans-imentation of medical standards for military service” and “abolishing the instructions in accordance with military willingness”.

The American District Judge Ana Reyers sharply questioned Trump’s administration because of the order, demanding that it know if it is a “ban on transgender persons” and whether the government’s position is that a transgender person is “ideology”.

Civic rights groups sued earlier this month to block the command on behalf of six transgender US service members, claiming that the order and discriminatory and unconstitutional, and state that it threatens US national security, as well as years of training and financial investments made by the Ministry of Defense .

The judge denies an effort guided by a Democrat to block the reach of reach, stating the lack of proven damage

E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse was seen after the pronunciation of former President Donald Trump on August 3. 2023 in Washington, DC ((Photo Sha Hanting/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images))

The court hearing on Tuesday mostly focused on how, or to what extent, the order may cause damage to members of transgender services. While Trump directed That the “radical gender ideology” was banned from all military branches, the executive order ceased to describe in detail how the Pentagon should do so, which prompted the rush of the questions and concerns of the plaintiff and the judge.

Reyes, appointed Biden and the first open Gay member of the Federal Bench of DC, spent most of the hearing on Tuesday, asking how the command would be implemented and whether the transgender service members would appoint in a lawsuit from their roles or separated from their units.

Tracking lawsuit: a new resistance that fights Trump’s second term through the attack of lawsuits aimed at EOS

US Defense Minister Peta Hegsetth brings objections during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Pentagon on February 5th in Arlington, Va. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

“Can we agree that the greatest combat force that world history has ever seen will not affect any way less than 1% of soldiers who use a different pronoun than others might want to call them,” Lynch asked.

At the other time of the hearing, she challenged the lawyers of the Ministry of Justice to find her a declarant or any confided officer who would come to the booth and tell the court that they had harmed the use of a sermon of members of transgender military members.

“I’ll bring you a cigar box,” Reyes told Lynch.

“If you can find someone who will tell me we are less prepared because we have to use pronouns for several thousand people … to have it.”

Doge achieves a great victory in court, has enabled access to data on 3 federal agencies

Air view of the Pentagon in Washington, DC, March 31, 2024, the U.S. Ministry of Defense Home, Pentagon is one of the world’s largest office buildings. (Daniel Slim/AFP via Getty Images)

Lych noted in response that the administration is still awaiting further guidelines on the terms of the executive order of transgender persons, which will determine its impact on the staff, including six transgender prosecutors named in that case.

This answer pointed out a little about the concern of Judge Reyes, who said to Lynch that the Government had to inform the court by Wednesday whether to ensure that the appointed members of the service would not be removed from his role in the army or to face discrimination as a direct result of the executive command.

If they fail, the judge said, the court will be renewed on Friday to consider the plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraint order.

Apart from the fact of the case, Reyes hid a little displeasure with a row.

At one point, during the hearing, she appointed a hypothetical lawyer of the Ministry of Justice, asking, “If you were in a fox hole” with another member of the service, “you would not care about their gender ideology, right?”

Click to get the Fox News app

She continued to suggest that Lynch would be happy to be next to someone with their praise and courage.

Lynch agreed that he suspected that gender identity would be in mind in that situation.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com