Canada is in the Maga world of problems.
The national “favorite” and “closest” friend has declared an exhausting trade war by imposing solid tariffs to most of the goods imported into the home of smooth capitalism – the United States of America.
An impulsive man-Daet man who treats American signature and the most lureal relationship as a Yo-Yo, is, of course, Mercurial, Make-America-Anain-Atainin, an American president who wore baseball, Donald Trump.
Threats and uncertainty are the most important features of Trump’s Ratoborna foreign policy that fatally underestimates Jejune’s proposal that he, unlike his predecessors who are triggers, is a candidate for “peace now”.
It directs anxiety that hovering over Canada like a heavy mantle is the fact that, at this key moment, the second largest country in the world leads to what is the Government of the Guardian with the Prime Minister of the Duck in Soon- Free Kolm.
This is not an ideal place for the usual sedmering nation more than 40 million, while fighting with a rival, which is violent in China, operates south of 49 parallels.
But the true self-absorbed history and creepy form, the management liberal party consumes the leadership that will choose the heir to the amazed entry-of-a-specific car-premiere-premium-premium-premiere-premiere-premium-premouter.
While he is bothering her to replace Trudeau by March 9, at least it seems to me, it seems to me that the liberals are looking for a political savior in all the wrong places.
As a general writing rule, I try to avoid generalizing generalization about a large place consisting of many different people.
However, I think it is fair to say that there is a beer among many Canadians about the present and the future that has launched, among other burning concerns, the awful costs of housing and food, as well as permeating the feeling that the compact between the citizens between the citizens and their government has evaporated.
I guess the story is a story that politicians along the narrow political spectrum in Canada used-ratio after a generation-how would they win in elections with frequent dimension promises to improve their lives for “ordinary Canadians”.
If the results of the recent surveys are correct, the head of the Conservative Party dependent on the cascade, Pierre Poilievre, is at its peak to become a prime minister after spending almost 10 years at the Purgatory-Purgatory benches.
Meanwhile, the head of the left -wing new Democratic Party, Jagmeet Singh, failed to echo with Canadians who longed for tangible solutions to emergency problems.
As a result, fluttering socialists remain stuck, incapable of escaping from the glib, comprehensive misconceptions to represent the “conscience” of parliament.
Desperate to Liberals in a position and prestige they turned to dipped eyes on two leading candidates-which, in spirit and purpose, faximil from each other-to stop preventing what was destined to be extinguished in the next federal elections that could happen already in the March.
Firm liberals always believed that they had an almost divine right to lead Canada and that power was right, not privilege.
As such, the search for power, not the common good, was the Raison d’etre of the Liberal Party.
Predictively, two leading position candidates, Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney, reactionaries who are committed to establishing the defense of the status quo, not seriously challenging it.
Obviously, everyone is outside the short -sighted partisans or Freeland or Carney are not a “retail” politician who enjoys this elusive touch that combines seriousness with accessibility.
Honestly, Freeland and Carney are just as charismatic as a pair of models.
Their commanded, bromide -filled performances on the shortened campaign track and, in Carney’s curious case, in an unusual “conversation” with Komichira Jon Stewart are unpleasant proof.
Both, with training and temperament, are technocrats that are decisively common together with comfortable chatter classes, of which they are now occupied by distancing, in a suitable search for the running voters.
The coming federal elections, like any choice before it, will lean to two words: change and hope.
As I have explained In the earlier column of government, they have expectations of natural life. Then, the appetite for the “new, fresh start” becomes inevitable despite the futile attempts to resist this wave similar to the impulse.
It is a difficult excess dilemma that Freeland and Carney face.
They will traffic in the imaginative idea that “change agents” that they can offer, in words and deeds, have discouraged the Canadians renewed hopes.
Considering her long, rooted ties with the tired, performance liberal government that the Canadians, as a whole, broke out, Freeland, in particular, confronted with the Hercules of History of Buca and distanced herself from the loser and responsibility that she once served with such a miss various higher cabinet workplaces, including as the Minister of Finance and Foreign Affairs.
After launching his forced departure, Trudeau calculated the point during his press conference, announcing the resignation in early January to remind the Canadian that Freeland was, in fact, Robin to his Batman.
“Chrystia has been next to me for 10 years,” Trudeau said. “She has been an amazing political partner through almost everything we have done as a government and a party in the past decade.”
Ouch.
Due to his self -service part, Carney, the former government of Canada and the bank of England, allegedly surrounded himself with the same hands that edited Trudeau JR into the Prime Minister’s office.
Plus Ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
If the overflow, Carney will not be crowned only by the leader of the Liberal Party, but also the Prime Minister.
Canadian 24. Prime Minister will then have to handle the spines that will surely undermine his legitimacy: Carney does not hold a place in parliament.
Poilievre – who did nothing else than sitting in parliament – will justifiably run into and shout, that Carney is missing the authority that the Canadians have awarded over the ballot box to manage even for a short time.
All the while Trump Gapir and Guna that he would force Canada to capitulate not only on his immediate demands, but, ultimately, to become 51.
In the midst of this expensive quarrel, liberals appear decisive, again, to choose a guarantee over Brawn.
Instead, you should ask for a protégé from Mesingan, former former Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien, who, who, in the travele of the unfortunate Iraqi war, wisely refused to join us. The “Coalition” of the Landscape.
He or she may just make a happy trick.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s and do not reflect the editorial position of Al Jazeere.
