Aston Villa prevented a goal against Wolves for Morgan Rogers Offside was a wrong decision, says Jamie Redknapp | Football news
Jamie Redknapp says the judge’s decision is to disable Aston Villa equator in Wolves for offsida Morgan Rogers was a “wrong decision” and the side of Unai Emery was “really unhappy” to see her.
Since Wolves beat 1-0 in the second half, Donyelll touched home in an empty net on a long postcard of a well-handled free kick, but the offsid flag rose against Rogers, who distracted Nelson’s defender in the upgrade.
Leon Bailey slid to John McGinn on the left of the free kick penalty area, but Rogers – in an offside position – stepped on the road to Semed to stop him to the villa’s captain. McGinn then crossed to score a small shot.
Pgmol said the goal was disabled because Rogers influenced “the ability to play or cause a ball” – but Redknapp claimed that Wolves defender never arrived at McGin – and the goal was to stand.
“Let’s be honest. The wolves had a lot of bad decisions against them, and they certainly get some luck here. That’s controversial.
“I understand Unai Emery, players and fans who wonder how it was not given on earth.
“Rogers enters the position and tries to block him. Is he disturbed enough? Not enough. Not for me.
“As a defender, Semedo looks at the wall. Instead, he has McGinn beyond him and would have to change the body position to see McGinn and the ball. If Rogers does not work, McGinn is still in. But since it is a routine of pieces , he obviously does.
“Rogers should not do anything because Semedo is not alive. You should check the shoulder and know what’s behind him. And Rogers really doesn’t really work much.
“You can even see that when the ball comes in, Semedo doesn’t even complain. He turns his hands in the air and says,” They made me. “
“I just think Rogers interferes with him enough. That’s the wrong decision. It doesn’t make enough to really stop Semedo, who is not hit on him. So I think they were wrong.
“If Rogers got caught and stopped him: I would say absolutely because you try to be too smart, you are offsid and distract him and interfere with him to stop the cross.”
Redknapp: Are Villa’s set Piece coaches too smart?
Redknapp also claimed that the coaches of the Aston Villa were set up – led by Emery’s assistant Austin McPhee – after that routine, perhaps “too smart for his own good.”
Villa scored nine goals from the Premier League pieces this season – only Arsenal (10) managed more.
“The coaches of the placed piece are very smart in the views of the set pieces – but they are almost too smart for their own good,” he added.
“Because of the poor position of the semed, they didn’t really need to do it [Rogers move]. You could slip the ball down the side, played over the goal and scored a goal anyway. “
What does the law say?
When the player does not touch the ball, the player is in the offset by mixing the opponent:
- Preventing the opponent to play or can play the ball clearly by disrupting the opposing line of vision or
- causing an opponent for the ball or
- A clear attempt to play a ball that is close when this action affects an opponent or
- Making an obvious action that obviously affects the ability of an opponent to play the ball
Emery Coy in his views of call
In the meantime, the manager of the emery villa was intended for the goal to stand – but he admitted that Var “made a mistake” this season.
“I don’t know because it’s Vir’s task,” he told Sky Sports after the game.
“Aide [coaches]They watched him and told me it wasn’t an offside because he didn’t touch the ball. But it’s Var’s task and I believe in Var.
“If I say something different, I’m not the right way with my thoughts. But even sometimes VAR, they make mistakes.”
However, Emery also admitted that his side of the villa deserved nothing of 90 minutes because of their performance.
In the first half, Villa was lagging behind through the opener of Jean-Aricner Bellegarde, before Matheus Cunha had lately sealed the result with a goal on the break.
“We tried. We started very well in the first 10 to 15 minutes, but they scored a goal,” Emery added. “It was harder to come back with the result, the end of the first half we were so, so bad. They had a chance to score a second goal, because we did not control them in the crossings.
“The second half we made some changes, we tried to push with fresh legs and try to have some options to score one goal or compete better than the first half. We did it, but that was not enough. If we scored one goal for one goal, It may have been different, and then they achieved the last minute.
