Tens of thousands of people went out to Berlin Street to protest what they see as a violation of taboos in post -war German politics.
The protests came after some parties voted with the end right party, an alternative to Germany (AFD), due to an inexperienced resolution on immigration last week.
The leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) Friedrich Merz, for which she was reached for the next German chancellor, tried twice to support AFD, including the proposal of a law aimed at suppressing immigration.
This move caused anger among many, with the organizers of the demonstration said that people turned out to be condemned to see as a violation of the land agreement not to work with the end right at the national level.
Demonstrations come three weeks before national elections and follow similar protests in Germany on Saturday.
Police estimate that about 160,000 people went to protest on Sunday. The rally started directly in front of the Bundestag, the German Parliament building and headed for the CDU headquarters.
Prot protester Anna Schwarz, 34, said AFP to join the political gathering for the first because “we can no longer prevent our view.”
“(We want to make as much noise as possible to invite the self -described” Democratic “parties to protect this democracy,” she said.
The CDU leads to the polls ahead of the German snap elections this month. AFD is currently elected second, although Merz has excluded any coalition with them.
On Wednesday, the proposal to change the Immigration Act was passed through the German parliament.
Two days later, the laws of the law with the aim of reducing the immigration number and the rights of family gathering was rejected by the German parliament with 350 votes at 338.
The strategy was broadly convicted, including Merz’s predecessor as the CDU -A -A -Cancer leader, Angela Merkel, who accused him of turning his back on the previous promise not to work with AFDD in Bundestag.
Merz defended his actions as “necessary” and said that he did not ask for the support of the party.
“The correct decision does not become wrong just because the wrong people agree to it,” he said last week.
