Takeaways from the Interview Times with Chuck Schumer on Federal Consumption Account
The leader of the Senate minority Chuck Schumer is facing the largest rebellion of Democrats in years but In an interview with an interview After being a crucial voice supported by a Republican federal account last week, he tried to throw out questions about whether he needed to step down. Democratic officials appeared amazed when Schumer made his faces in the consumption account, claiming that the choice was less than two evils. Schumer defended his decision in the second part of our broad interview, even when questions over his leadership of high party officials continued.
Here are three deviations from part of the closure of our conversation.
Schumer explained that he had given his voice to prevent the further decomination of the Government Doge and Trump.
Schumer said he had made a “very, very difficult” decision to support a Republican proposal of the law to prevent the extinguisher of the Government, which he said, wanted by President Trump and Elon Musk. He called Trump and Musk “Anti -Town’s fanatics” and “nihilists”.
They want to close “an agency after the agency,” he said, which would create the situation far worse than the Republican law. Continued:
Two days from now on closing, they could say, well, the food stamps for children are not important. It’s gone. All veterans offices in rural areas are gone. Social Insurance, Medicare, Medicaid. They don’t matter. We reduce them back. So it would be awful. The damage I can do under closure is much worse than any other damage they could do.
Isn’t this just – Wait, let me finish, Lulu. Can last forever. No ramp. One of the Republican senators told us: Let’s go to close, it will be there for six months, nine months, a year. And until then their goal of destroying the Federal Government would disappear. And finally, one last point here, and that is right now under CR, you can go to court and challenge the executive order to turn off something. Under the exclusion, the executive branch has the only power.
He admitted that he and Hakeem Jeffries did not talk from voting.
Although he accepted that there were “divisions” within his party around his voice, he insisted that he and his colleagues Democrats respect each other and that they were united in their fight against Trump.
Schumer reluctantly admitted that he and the leader of the minority of the home, Hakeem Jeffries, who often talk, did not speak from Schumer’s surprising voice, suggesting that there was a rupture between the two highest Democrats in Congress.