Manchester United owes Rival clubs more than £ 390 million in unpaid transfer The fees and approximately £ 200 million reach that debt in the next 12 months.
The publication of United accounts for the second quarter of the financial year is welcomed by grimaces and gloomy expressions. The club’s total revenues took a significant goal, the return of the broadcasts almost halved and their operational profit was effectively deleted.
AND Eye cost From Erik Ten Hag’s departure and the subsequent arrival of Ruben Amorim did not raise the mood at a club that continues lose millions of pounds Every year to finance interest payments to the debt that has accumulated a family of unpopular glaze.
It was also discovered that United You need to find £ 390.8 million down the couch to pay off the transfers they have already made.
Modern contracts often include structured fees, spreading the total sum of years – the exact nature of this expansion may be a decrease in certain transfers if the sales club requires too much total fee in advance.
In the last three years, only two clubs in world football (Chelsea and Paris Saint-Germain) spent more on incoming players than Manchester United. The Red Devils have broken over £ 570 million since 2022, and have been handed over to the contracts worth £ 200 million this season alone, with Leny Yoro, Matthijs de Ligt and Manuel Hungary arrived Ten HagConsidering last summer.
There may be no Dutchman, but the account for his acquisition is nowhere to go. Of the £ 390 million that United owes to fees, almost £ 200 million in the next year.
Despite being among the biggest consumers in world football, United’s huge expense was not rewarded with success on Bok. Current main coach Ruben amorim described His side as “the worst team maybe in Manchester United history.” These deviations can be the result of a club employment strategy.
The ten haga seemed an unusually swollen influence on United’s identity of United signatures, leaning to the players with whom he had a direct experience of managing or confronting. The influential co -owner of the Sir Jim Ratcliffe Club regretted the lack of statistical support behind most of the club moves. “Data analysis comes with employment. There is really no here,” the British billionaire sighed in December. “We are still on the data analysis here in the last century.”
Ratcliffe didn’t really help club employment or financial health Dan Ashworth sports director dismissal Five months after his arrival, everyone cost the princely sum of £ 4.1 million.
Read the latest news about Man UTD, transmission of rumors and gossip
