Trump’s trade selection is obtained on the Canary tariff

There is old cliche If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog. Alliances change here with political winds.

The good news for Canada is that there is fresh evidence that, at the moment, he has allies on tariffs. People express the horror of threats that they will slap them all over the board, currently on a break.

US President Donald Trump for a trade emperor received a stalk during a hearing in the confirmation of the Senate, because the legislators conveyed stories of worried voters.

Bad news? The loudest complaints have arrived from Democrats, which have about as much power as a teapot puddle in this city, at least until the middle year.

Still, their return, paired with Republican discomfort, signaled one thing: large tariffs in Canada are viewed as a political dud. No one supported them.

“America this week had its first taste of Trump trade policy”: so Democrat Ron Wyden helped start his hearing on Thursday.

“His tariff bluff has created a huge uncertainty that costs American work … In my opinion, it’s a misuse [our trade] law.”

It is important to note that the US Congress has a limited power to stop the president’s tariff without passing a new law Reclaiming his constitutionally Role in relation to the trade. So, the hearing on Thursday did not signal the immediate action – it was a political time spatula, showing how it blows politics.

And the message to Trump’s trade representative, Jamieson Greer, was emphasized: they do not apply tariffs to the blankets in Canada. In most Republicans Welcome As a negotiating tactic, useful as an influence, but not as a politics.

Several Republicans expressed this cunningly. Instead of directly challenging the unquestionable chief of their party, they cited subtle worries.

Greer avoided an attitude about the imposition of Canadian tariffs in the future.

Former head of Trump’s first Marine trade representative Robert Lighthizer, Greer spoke about why they were now facing liberalized stores as default positions.

He choked as he spoke of his parents living in a mobile home, doing several jobs to put an end to the end.

He has produced the redistribution of manufacturing affairs as a moral enterprise, as well as strategic, to protect the supply chains in an increasingly unstable world.

“America should be a manufacturer’s country. We are more than what we consume,” Greer said, criticizing the past trade policy.

He made it clear that an early priority would be the negotiating aspects of the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement, as the law requires; While the countries have a decade to renovate it, Trump intends to move quickly.

He quoted the famous Trump’s concern about the existing Pact. At the top of that list are method for calculating what is calculated as a North American car, and milkman.

“Immediately outside the door, I expect others to look at usmac,” Greer said, and at the same time deserving the success of the Pact.

Anecdotes from countries

Adjusting trade policies, as his mentoring lighthizer did, is now a dominant position in American politics, and there is a lot of support at Capitol Hill.

What is concerned with some lawmakers is that politics no longer run trade professionals like Greer, but Trump’s crew for freedom.

For example, the high Republican Chuck Grassley basically asked Greer: Who calls the shots here, you or the Howard Lutnick Store Secretary, whom Trump named as his tariff point?

Several senators recalled Greer that his office is legally responsible for monitoring the trade and is responsible for their board.

Greer went through sensitive office policy: he pointed out that different offices do different things and that wards of trade and treasuries play a role in retaliated actions.

Democrats became armed with concern.

The Nevadi Senator spoke there about the fall in Canadian tourism, a special care for her state, which includes Las Vegas; Talking about a boycott and a depreciated Canadian dollar, she said she was taking care of the impact.

She quoted assessment From the American Travel Association, to cost a 10 -pointed drop of Canadian trip to the US economy over two billion US dollars in lost consumption and 14,000 jobs; A similar fall from Mexico would double that damage.

The same senator, Catherine Cortez Masto, then talked about the call she received from a small company in Rena; The Canadian buyer canceled the contract for uncertainty, which cost tens of thousands of dollars.

“What do I say to my companies?” Gerer asked. When Greer replied that people should trust Trump’s trade policy, because in his first term, she coincided with growing revenues and low inflation, she returned.

“So, these small businesses, I will just have to tell them,” Unfortunately, you will be a victim in a trade war. Suck it. That’s better for the country “?” she answered.

“I’m not sure that is the answer I want to pass on to them. … There must be common sense.”

Jeanne Shaheen in New Hampshire talked about tariffs that run heating at home costs $ 100.

Vermont’s Peter Welch said he had over 150 worried companies at a recent call – ranging from a large construction company, to organic farmers, to a woman who got a weaving yarn: “Each of these people was just stunned by the implications of these -blue threats tariffs, “he said.

GOP dances more delicate

Tina Smith Minnesota called Trump’s behavior reckless. She said she supported some types of tariffs, but that she would fight the wide in Canada and Mexico, who harmed her voters: “The soil is cut below them.”

Republicans danced a little more delicate.

“I’m not against the tariff. I just mean tariffs, for tariffs, I’m not very sure [that]”said Bill Cassidy of Louisiane, who instead suggested tariffs about countries with high greenhouse gases, like China.

“I’m not sure how the law is applied.”

Ron Johnson of Wisconsin warned that if “we start slapping tariffs on steel,” said manufacturers in his country will still need certain species that have not been made in the US, he also questioned How much revenue Tariffs would actually create for now

“I just don’t see him. I’m an accountant. I love numbers,” Johnson said.

Greer replied that the tariffs would not replace all tax revenues because the US government is now much higher than it was when they were federal taxes initially Introduced in 1913.

But indeed, the most creative criticism of the passive aggression-she came from Thoma Tillis in North Carolina.

It is worth noting that Tillis is next year for a re -choice and is facing a Republican primary challenge -And criticizing Donald Trump too explicitly risks the move that ends up in a career. Especially as one of the more moderate members of his MP.

Thus Tillis praised Trump on his creative ideas for forcing unwavering allies to correct their policies.

He said of Canada, “It is necessary to inform them. Because they act as a mindless children. … they take us for granted.”

The rebuke followed so subtly that you would have to make twice to catch it.

Tillis said it was obvious that any tariffs would be targeted, not spraying on the economy in general. “Everyone has this false narrative that we will just do force tariffs all over the board. It’s illogical.”

Now where would people get this stupid idea that Trump intends to apply tariffs to all sides, to products around the world?

Perhaps this is from his specific promise that he will do it on his campaign platform and in every campaign speech and his Recently published orders About China, Mexico and Canada.

He paused from the tariff to Mexico and Canada, unlike China. And judging by the mood on Capitol Hill, US legislators hope to remain forever paused.