Breaking News

The lobby of the speaker: the tangible dishonest act


Judge Shawn Hochuli has been educated by football fans recently as a rule 12, Section 3, Article 4 of the NFL Regulations.

Hochuli threatened to give Philadelphia Eagles Automatic Touchdown after Washington commanders committed three consecutive goal lines on the NFC Championship match.

Washington Linebacker Frankie Luva launted himself twice-chasing Superman in the middle of the flight-Zarimmage line before the eagles broke the ball on the line with one yard. Luva was trying to prevent the Eagle striker from being hurt to get into the end zone behind his massive lining.

After each offense, Hochuli slid the ball closer to the goal -Linija. “Half a distance to the goal line” is a sanction, which means that the ball progressed several inches each time, and Philadelphia got a new set of downs. But after the second offense, Hochuli announced that Luva would evaluate the unsportsmanlike sentence if he repeated it.

Consumption Calculation: Republicans will have to score voices – but they have not yet asked

Luva is not.

But in the third game, Washington’s defense move Jonathan Allen jumped briefly from the offsids before shooting.

Hochuli blew a whistle, estimated the punishment for the attack and moved the ball forward until the nose practically kissed the chalk naked.

Unlike football, there is no unclear, baked rules that enables the negatives of the “unjust” act to overpower it-which could only be difficult for the critics of the freezing of President Trump already assigned federal funds. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

The judge then taught the nation on one of the most brilliant rules in any athletic rulebook.

“Washington advised the judges to assign the result if this type of behavior is repeated,” Hochuli said, to the satisfaction of a partisan crowd full of Lincoln Finanual Field in South Philly.

The rule declares the following:

“A player or replacement will not interfere with the game by any act that is tangible unjust. The punishment: for a sensibly unfair act: the offender may be disqualified. The judge, after consulting the official crew, conducts any such distance to be considered equal and regardless of any other code of the sentence.

Political Fire Storm that will soon be Singge Capitol Hill

In short, if Washington had committed another sentence, Hochuli could stop crawling the ball toward the goal line. He would just give the Eagles six points on the table.

Rule 12, Section 3, Article 4 does not exist in management or politics. In addition to the voters, there are no judges like Shawn Hochuli for an assessment of punishment, extract the discipline and consent of the team.

And that is what Vexes Democrats – and some Republicans – when it comes to Trump administration Moves to freeze the money that Congress has applied throughout the side.

Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution makes delegation of the authority of consumption very clear – which is a great reason why the Ministry of the Government of Elona is so controversial on Capitol Hill. (Anna Moneymaker)

Article I, Section 9. The Constitution is clear about which branch of the Government controls the wires of the handbag:

“Money should not be drawn from the treasury, but as a result of the funds made by law.”

In other words, the Congress is responsible for spending money. Executive power simply cannot unilaterally prevent what Congress consumes. President Richard Nixon tried it in the mid-1970s with a “recess”. Nixon’s administration blocked the spending of money awarded by Congress.

Musk’s Doge targets the Federal Agency ‘Viper’s Nest’ with a global trail

That’s why Elon Musk The “Government Efficiency Department” or “Doge” is so controversial. First of all, it is not a “department” like a state department or the Ministry of Energy. It is indeed a “American dog service”, located under the auspices of a small agency within the executive power: US digital service.

But President Trump approved Elona Musk and his team approach to examination mode to reduce consumption. Doge service cannot only reduce consumption itself. At least not constitutionally. And it certainly cannot eliminate another agency, such as the US Agency for International Development, USAID.

Unless the Congress says.

The leader of the Senate majority John Thune, R.Sd., called the president’s “temporary” break at federal scholarships and loans “normal practice” for the newly married other Trump administration. (Getty Images)

Because of this, the drama last week about the automatic freezing of federal grand and loans to the legislators of both sides on the Capitol Hill. Provided that the administration called for a “temporary” break. And even some powerful Republicans were fine with that.

“I think this is a normal practice at the beginning of the administration until we have the opportunity to know how money is spent,” said the leader of most Senate John Thune, Rs.d., about stopping. “I think it’s just a preliminary step I think most administration is taking.”

But Congress generally preserves its prerogative consumption very carefully. It would be extraordinary for legislators to pass because of fiscal responsibilities to the executive authority without a fight.

Political Fire Storm that will soon be Singge Capitol Hill

Therefore, when approving a refraining order to abolish moves by the administration of the usurping of the Congress Consultation Body, US District Judge Loren Alikhan stated that there was a potential for “irreversible damage to” federal agencies and that the actions of administration could be “catastrophic”.

Republicans have raised several hacks about administration decisions. But Democrats and their allies emphasized the weight of the circumstances.

“This is a deeply constitutional question,” claimed Senator Angus King, I-Maine. “What happened last night is the most widespread attack on the authority of the Congress, I believe in the history of the United States. This is obviously unconstitutional. Article two does not give the executive government to determine the budgets or expenses authorized in the article awarded in Article three in Congress.”

The exclusion of the US International Development Agency or USAID has attracted the anger of many Democrats of Home and Senate. (CELAL GUNES/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

USAID closed on Monday and employees were closed from a computer system. Musk said the agency should be closed.

Democrats of houses and Senate set off on Monday to the USAID Washington headquarters to protest against Doge and Mosus’ moves.

“If you want to change the agency, present the bill and make a law. You can’t wave an agency you don’t like,” said Senator Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.

“Just as Elon Musk did not create USAID, he does not have the power to destroy him,” said Ambassador Jamie Rskin, D-md., The best Democrat on the home approval committee. “We do not have the fourth branch of the government called Elon Musk.”

USAID closes the staff gazebo on Monday because Musk says Trump supports the closure agency

The administration moves last week and over the weekend to tread on the powers of Congress consumption were so awful that Democrats may have hoped that Judge Shawn Hochuli was around to give them the result. Democrats claimed that the move was so beyond the pale that could qualify as a “tangible dishonest work.” They could say that the maneuver was so constitutionally disgusted that they should assign the “result” to the democrats.

State Secretary Marco Rubio He declared himself a new head of USAID.

“They should take over the direction of politics from the State Department, and not. Their view is that they do not have to answer us. This is not true and that will no longer be the case,” Rubio said.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has declared himself a new head of USAID, claiming that “their attitude is that they do not have to answer [the State Department]. This is not true and that will no longer be the case, “ (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, pool)

During appearance on Fox, Mike Johnson’s house speakerR-L., He said that he was saved to save to pay until the end to the renovation of Trump’s tax reductions.

“We have to find those savings,” Johnson said. “We will have huge savings by making the Government more effective and efficient.”

The Chairman of the House of House Sam Graves, R-Mo., He noticed that he had heard from the State Transport Departments, trying to understand which programs were now suspended.

Political Fire Storm that will soon be Singge Capitol Hill

“A lot of money is frozen,” Graves said. “There are some programs that the President and Congress do not want to move forward, and we have to adjust many of these programs.”

A deadline for financing the Government in about five weeks. With its narrow majority, it is generally believed that the Republicans may need the help of democrats in order for the government to be open. But Democrats can now rebel because they believe that the GOP members will be willing to give the powers of the executive power.

Senator Patty Murray, D-Wash., He is a top Democrat on the approval committee. He asks what happens if the foreign agreement is reached, “and this administration says it’s a bed. We don’t have to go through.”

Senator Patty Murray, D-Wash. He asked what could happen if both sides reached an agreement that Trump’s administration considers “work”. (Anna Rose Layden/Pool over Reuters)

Murray added that “the level of confidence is the lowest I have ever seen here in Congress.”

There is no judge in politics. There will be lawsuits. Court challenges. Battles that will be angry for years.

But it is up to the voters to determine whether what Trump’s administration is now doing is a “unfair act.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

And voters will not have the opportunity to assign the result until the earliest November next year.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com