As federal judges You are crossing the command of the order for the entire country that blocks President Donald Trump’s orders, some have re -examined that each confirmed and whether the Republicans could have predicted their judgments or do something more to block them.
Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo.A member of the powerful Senate judiciary committee, told Fox News Digital in an interview: “That’s why I think I voted against every Biden judge.”
He admitted that many judges were confirmed before his time, given that he was first elected in 2018.
Scoop: Top Republican Chuck Grassley sets up a quick hearing about judges blocking Trump
Donald Trump and Judges James Boasberg, Amir Ali also Ana Reyes (Valerie Pleshbia/District of Columbia/SenatorDurbin via YouTube/Bill Pugliano via Getty Images)
“People told me,” Why are you never voting for any of Bide’s judges?“” He said. “Because of that.”
“Because if they are not faithful to the rule of the law, then you can bet that they will only seek the possibilities to intervene politically.”
Since Trump entered his duty, he faced a number of prohibitions across the country to stop the actions of his administration, which exponentially outweighs the number his predecessors saw. So far, in his new term, the courts have hit him with about 15 wide orders, more than former President George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden have received throughout his term.
Some of those who ordered Trump’s administration to stop certain actions are James Boasberg, Amir Ali, Loren Alikhan, William Alsup, Deborah Boardman, John Couchenour, Paul A. Engelmayer, Amy Berman Jackson, Angel Kelley, Brendan A. Lapberth, Royce, Royce, Royce, Royce, Royce, Royce, Royce, Royce, John. There are 94 districts in the US and at least one district court in each country. These courts are where cases are first listened to before potentially complain of higher courts.
Senate is confirmed by Dr. Marty Makary as Trump’s FDA boss
President Donald Trump and US District Judge James Boasberg (Getty)
Several of these judges have been confirmed in the Senate in a two -sided way, and some even prevailed without opposition. There were others who opposed every Republican senator.
One of the most controversial judges, Boasberg, known for blocking the key immigration campaign of Trump’s administration, confirmed the vote of the call after Obama appointed it in 2011. The vote was 96-0 and no Republicans opposed him.
Former Trump lawyer Jim Trusty told Fox News Digital, “I don’t think the Republicans never expected a pretty attack of the law we saw when President Trump was in power.”
“The activist nature of some judges of the Federal District Court – who publish prohibitions throughout the country against the executive authority for a notification – is unhappy and pressures the appeal courts, including Scotus, to solve these problems,” he explained.
However, he said that the real problem was the “army of a lawyer”, which he said they were trying to “bend and twist legal principles.”
“They spend their days dedicated to stopping the agenda of President Trump, even if it means that they are capable of dealing with members of the Venecuela gangs who have entered the United States illegally,” Trusty claimed.
GOP Senator says Dr. Oz he ignored his questions about transgender issues, abortion
Venecuelan migrants arrive at Caracas in Venezuela after being deported from the United States, March 24, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)
Andy McCarthy, a former US lawyer’s assistant and a Fox News associate, told Fox News Digital, “Republicans could do a much better job by blocking Biden’s court meetings.”
He pointed out to Biden’s recent time as president of the poor duck, which is especially true of nominees who have “boiled” because of the Republican absences.
“Biden’s nominated were very radical and needed to confront as much as possible,” he said. “These are lifelong meetings and advanceds that fill these grooves for decades will be a thorn on the country.”
However, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo, said: “There was no way to know how to rule in future cases like these.”
He claimed that the senators could make their duty attention to the best abilities, but they cannot see in the future.
“The Senate has the right to dismiss candidates who think the Constitution will misinterpret, but the nominees also have an obligation not to promise to be able to rule cases after joining the bench,” Yoo said.
Thomas Jipping, an older legal associate with the Center for Legal and Justice Studies, Edwin Meesi III at the Heritage Foundation, recorded Fox News Digital that the senators “cannot use a filibuster for a judge’s defeat”, which makes it even more difficult to block the controversial nominees nominated.
“The only way to actually beat one’s confirmation is to have a majority of votes,” he explained. “If the Republicans are in the minority, there must be at least a few democrats who voted against a democratic candidate to win someone.”
Fox News Digital addressed the former Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., And Chairman of the Senate Committee of Senate Chuck Grassley, R-iowa, to comment that these judges could be confirmed.
The McConnell office did not deal with issues regarding judges who were confirmed unanimously or without opposition. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Senators were asked if they were still satisfied how the judges were confirmed and their individual voices. They were also asked if there was anything alarming in the minutes of the judges and whether the Republicans had done enough to block certain certificates.
McConnell’s office pointed to Fox News Digital on the comments he gave through a legislative vacation at a press conference in Kentucky.
“A way to consider all these efforts in reorganization by the administration is what is legal and what is not … They will be defined in the courts,” he told reporters in response to the legality of the potential exclusion of the Department of Education. “I can understand the desire to reduce state consumption. Every administration – some not as brave as this – have tried to do it in one way or the other. This is a different approach … and the courts will ultimately decide whether the president will have these different steps. Some may have different outcomes, I will just wait – as if everyone will, in fact, and see if it is perspective.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Grassley’s office pointed to the previous statement by Senator spokeswoman Clare Slattery.
“The recent rush of deletion decisions of district judges deserves serious supervision. The Senate Justice Committee will carefully examine this topic at the hearing and exploring potential legislative solutions in the coming weeks,” she said.
The Committee for the next week specifically provided for the prohibition hearing.
