Pentagon agrees to stimulate a deadline for banning military prohibition of transgender persons
The ban on Trump administration of transgender persons serving in the military should enter into force on Friday after delay and court challenges controversial Ministry of Defense (DOD) policy.
American District Judge Ana Reyes based in DC, IstemShe was chaired by hearing on March 21, where she asked for the department to delay its original deadline for March 26 for the adoption of politics.
Reyes said she wanted to allow more time for the appeal. She also said that she had allowed a lot of time earlier to complain of an earlier opinion to block the prohibition to enter into force.
“I don’t want to get a dc circle. That’s my main concern here,” Reyes said during a hearing on March 21. “My chambers worked incredibly hard to get their minds on time.”
Another judge rules Trump’s removal of transgender troops
President Donald Trump and Minister of Defense Peta Hegsetth are shown here. The prohibition of the Ministry of Defense to transgender people serving in the army should take effect on Friday. (Getty Images)
Reyes gave the government the deadline at 15:00 on the same day to return to his request to encourage the deadline.
The government replied, saying that it agreed to delay the deadline from March 26 to March 28.
The legal challenge comes because the US Supreme Court also believes that the case is a large profile that deals with transgender rights. Question in the case, the United States Against Nredthati, is the clause of equal protection, which requires that the government treats similarly housed people the same, forbids the states to allow Medical providers Deliver puberty and hormone blockers to help the minor transition to another gender.
The High Court’s decision, however, is expected by May or June.
“The Decision of Narrotija will take up a good part of the field here and provide some guidelines. And so I doubt that the DC circle will feel the need to rush things,” said Charles Stiimson, an older legal colleague from the Heritage Foundation, for Fox News Digital.
“If I was sitting on a DC circle and I had all the other cases that came to me, and I was on a three judge board, I don’t think it would be the top of my crowd.”
The US District Judge based at DC Ana Reyes, appointed Biden, held a hearing on March 21 and asked for the Ministry of Defense to delay its original deadline for the adoption of March 26. (Getty/Senatonrurubin via YouTube)
Despite the upcoming time limit, Stimson said the ban would be “on a break” while the parties work through the appeal procedure.
“I don’t think the secretary will do anything, violating the court order,” Stimson said. “Even if they disagree with that, it would be smart.”
Reyes issued a preliminary prohibition in favor of the plaintiff on March 18th. Reyes wrote in her opinion that the plaintiffs were in a lawsuit that include transgender individuals, “they face their violation of their Constitutional rightswhich represents an irreparable damage “that would justify a preliminary ban.”
On March 21, accused in a lawsuit, including president Donald Trump The Minister of Defense, Peta Hegsetth, also submitted a proposal to dissolve a ban that blocked the prohibition of pentagon. The application claimed that politics was not a comprehensive prohibition, but instead “turns the gender dysphoria-medical condition and does not discriminate against the trans-imentification person as a class.”
On March 21, the defendant in the lawsuit, including President Donald Trump and Defense Minister of Defense of Fifth Hegsetth, filed a proposal for dissolving the prohibition that blocked the prohibition of Pentagon. (Reuters/Yves Herman)
Trump’s administration further requested that if a proposal to dissolve, the court should remain a preliminary ban until the appeal.
The government quoted new guidelines issued on March 21 that he expects to bring a policy that is not underway. The guidelines explained that “phrases” show symptoms in accordance with gender dysforia “just refers to” “individuals showing such symptoms that would be sufficient to become diagnosed.”
In its proposal, seeking the dissolution of the ban on March 18, the government wrote that the guidelines of March 21 represent a “significant change” that would guarantee court dissolving the ban.
According to the requirements, the party that requires the dissolution of the preliminary prohibition must show “a significant change either in factual conditions or in the law” that shows that the continuous implementation of the order would be “harmful to public interest”.
“Guidelines on March 21, 2025 represent” a significant change “, states in the submission of the application.” While the court widely interpreted the scope of the Dod policy to cover all trans-imentification members or applicants, the new guideline is subjected to the consistent position of the defendant to deal with the soldier, deployed and costs related to the medical status. “
Fox News’ Jake Gibson contributed to this report.
