Volume of works presented at the Victor Trumper Symposium in Sydney during 2015 was examined by “Archie Mac” on this website in September 2017. The book was recently published under the title Young joke encouraged me to re -inspect Roger Page’s contribution to this volume, and his piece was at his forehead Trumper in the press. In the otherwise very informative and fine part of writing (including 8 pages), seven words that formed the ending in the next passage hit me as quite unusual:
“Considering Trumper’s status – he was known in his day as well as Don Bradman during the 1930s and 1940s and Shane Warne in recent times – seem incredible, at least today, that the books that were written during his life were not written. A stick and a ballHistory of Eastern Melbourne and short-term annual and periodics published in this time- and his {Trumper’s life life was supposed to shorten. ”
(This passage that appears on pages 165/6: added to it.)
I soon realized that the effect of this supplement was to water and that he clashed with the first punishment, at the same time, making misconceptions on offer. Trumper died when he had already played 255 first -class games up to 36 and 4 months, and 15 full seasons in Australia plus five foreign tours. And it is reasonable to expect that – even with good health – Trumper would have more than some 4 to 6 years effective Participation in the first -class crime remained in it, until then he would be in his early forties.
Moreover, Trumper could be hesitant to continue beyond its late thirties, while I am gathering that the Ga-do this moment-the family could no longer support the family and needed paid employment. He was classified as an “amateur” cricket and did not receive a salary or fee for playing a game (although he was beneficially beneficial to benefits from his testimony held in February 1913, and received a stake in receiving doors to cover costs and potential losses). Further participation in the Crite, so he would eat the time he has been potentially spent working and charging for it.
Although it is stated on the front cover of this volume of this volume that “Ronald Cardwell edited, following the front page, there is a note that states a trio editors, including Julee Gould and Peter Lloyd, except Mr. Cardwell himself – although without coincidence with individual works with one or more of these individuals. However, as Mr. Cardwell was de facto The editor -in -chief should take responsibility for this editorial Gaff, even if it is not a fundamental culprit.
And not only the author – Roger Page – who realizes that his dedicated manuscript has been amended. This is that Mr. Cardwell now recognizes that an editorial gaffe has been truly made. Personally, I think his effect is such that he throws a shadow over a piece of Roger Page -aua.
Accordingly, the main objective of this note “corrections” is a warning of those who have acquired a copy of this volume in that special thing and suggest that they go to the top of page 166 and yarns in the last seven words of insults. Then they could see Roger’s piece in a more favorable light. (And if the reprint is considered in due course, the error can then be corrected – omission.)
Finally to say this: it is possible that Mr. Cardwell himself does not have the surviving note to actually make an unhappy addition. Skeptics could wonder if the supplement brought an undisputed intervention of an unknown external party. Those among them who believe in the existence of aliens and think that there is credible evidence for them who occasionally visited this country, they could doubt that it was a true source of seven additional words. I have to admit that maybe the aliens have made such visits. Still, it is a long bow to think that certain aliens knew about this cricket and the fact that his life was interrupted. First of all, they would need the ability to read English and also managed to get a relevant document. So I feel that we can loosen up such a possible cause of adding.
