IN Crown control Committee in India (BCCI) imposed a A two-year suspension on Harry Brook participate in Indian Premier League (IPL) After withdrawing from the 2025 season. The verdict, which comes to the newly established policy of withdrawal, raised her eyebrows among the crisis fans.
Brook, whom he bought Delhi Capitals (DC) For INR 6.25 Crore at IPL 2025 auction, he cited his obligations to England national team as a reason for his withdrawal. However, this marked the second consecutive year he pulled out of IPL, which led to the strict implementation of BCCI’s reign that participate in the players in two future IPL seasons if they withdraw for no valid reason.
Bcci -E’s strict policy of withdrawing players and his implications
The BCCI introduced the strict withdrawal policy ahead of the 2025 IPL auction, ensuring that the franchises did not remain in a difficult position for the last moment. According to this policy, if the player withdraws for no valid reason, such as injury or emergency in the family, he will face an automatic two -year ban on future IPL auctions and signatures. Brook withdrawal has launched this rule, and it will be disqualified to play IPL 2026 and IPL 2027.
This choice had serious consequences for Delhi, who recruited Brook to enhance his middle order after losing Rishabh panties. His sudden departure left a huge void in DC’s stroke department, forcing them to find a replacement only days from the beginning of the tournament. Brook’s absence also caused financial damage, with INR 6.25 crowns invested at it to spend the second exchanger on the auction.
Moeen Ali also Adil Rashid defends BCCI’s decision against Harry Brook
Several players, including Brook’s teammates from England, Moeen and Adil Rashid, supported the decision of BCCI, emphasizing that players must take responsibility for their obligations. Speaking on a chin before the crislet podcast, Moeen Ali, who will play for Kolkat Knight Riders (KKR)He stated that he believed the ban was for the FER, because Brook’s withdrawal disrupted the strategy and auction plans in Delhi Capitals. He mentioned that in the past, several players got out of IPL, and then returned to get better financial offers, which can be unfair with franchise.
Also read: Delhi Capitals (DC) announces a new deputy captain on the eve of the IPL 2025
“It’s not sharp. In some ways I agree with this, because a lot of people have done so before, and they come back and get a better financial package. It messes with teams for teams when the player suddenly pulls out, and is unfair to the franchises that invest in certain players,” ” Said Moeen.
Rashid also distributed similar views, stating that the rule was already established before the auction, and Brook was aware of the consequences of draw. He further added that IPL is a very important tournament, and when one player withdraws for no valid reason, it hurts not only a team but also the League reputation. Both players emphasized that this rule should be implemented to support the honesty and responsibility among the crisletters playing in franchise leagues.
“This rule was already established before the auction. Every player who puts his name on the IPL auction is aware that if they retire, he will ban two years. So Brook has previously known the consequences. I think it’s not sharp – that’s just the way the system works,” Said Rashid.
Also read: IPL 2025: 3 players who can replace Harry Brook in Delhi Capital (DC)
