In a report on October 7, the Israeli Security Agency claims some guilt for the Netanyahu government

The Israeli Home Security Service on Tuesday took responsibility for missing the warning of signs of the planned Hamas attack before the devastating strike of militants on October 7, 2023, but the Agency also blamed the Israeli government for policies, which he said had enabled Hamas to gather quietly and obtain funds and obtain support, between them.

Locks from the lower leg, such as a well -known security agency, have been published for days after similar an investigation into the Israeli army They found that senior officers had significantly underestimated Hamas and misinterpreted the wound warnings that a major attack was coming.

The report published on Tuesday consisted only of a declared summary, leaving an unknown amount of material undiscovered. But even the summary of the clear misses of the agency.

Plans for the Hamas attack on southern Israel reached the tables of intelligence agents in 2018 and again in 2022, the abstract said, but the agency did not treat warnings as a significant threat. As a result, the agency said, did not include it in the scenarios exploring future conflicts with a militant group.

Although Shin Beth said that he took Hamas seriously, he admitted that he did not respond appropriately to the wounds of the attack plans or the later signs of the upcoming bloodshed.

Israeli authorities have announced that they publish findings, even while holding parts of the classified report, in the light of the attack of the attack. About 1,200 people were killed that day, and about 250 people took hostage, they went to war in Gaza’s belt.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Government resisted an independent review of events that led to the most dead days in Israel’s history. Instead, it enabled each of the safety institutions in the country to be explored, despite public requirements for the Investigative Commission.

In a debate in the Israeli Parliament on Monday, Mr. Netanyahu said he supported the creation of the Hamas attack committee, but suggested that such an investigation would inevitably generate biased findings directed to aim for him to target him.

“Don’t distract me with a fictional investigation and a political attack,” he said. “I’ll still insist on the truth. I will continue to require a balanced investigative commission that will reach the truth.”

Mr. Netanyahu’s resistance to investigation and calls for his resignation is contrary to the actions of some other Israeli officials.

Standy Military Chief of Staff, Lieutenant Herzi Halevi, who is to bringNing took responsibility this month for what he called his “terrible failure” to prevent the attack. Shin bet, Ronen Bar, said Israeli newspaper media On Tuesday, he did not intend to resign until all the hostages taken from Israel were returned, but admitted that the attack could have been prevented.

In his report, Shin Bet also said that he failed to coordinate enough with the army and establish a clear chain of responsibility. “This is not the standard we have expected from us and the public from us,” the agency said.

At the same time, a BET report for Shin, unlike a recent military, directly pointed to government policies as factors that contribute to the attack. It said the government allowed Hamas to accumulate weapons and raise money for its military wing through Qatar. And it pointed out the reluctance of the Government to take “offensive” initiatives, including the target of Hamas leaders in Gaza.

The agency also cited the treatment of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli detention and “perception that Israeli society weakened.” Before the attack, Mr. Netanyahu progressed the plan for the overhaul of the Israeli judiciary, moving Protests across the countryand many Israelis have Mr. Netanyahu’s wrong Hamas attack, citing homemade unrest as a factor that strengthened the militants.

BET report for Shin echoes the findings New York Times article Published weeks after the attack, based on an interview with Israeli, Arab, European and American officials, as well as examination of the documents and evidence of the Israeli government.

Mr. Netanyahu’s office declined to comment on the discovery of Shin Bet. Israeli newspaper media reported that the office has announced unofficial statement a small group of local journalists who were “attached to the internal circle of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahua. “This statement says the intelligence agency presented a” “investigation” that does not answer questions “and did not answer” the size of the huge failure of the organization. “

The Prime Minister’s office presented a number of intelligence agents failures, including an assessment only a few days before the attack “definitely stating” that Hamas wanted to avoid a campaign against Israel. She accused the gentleman at least that he had passed.

“The chase boss for the lower leg did not consider it appropriate to awaken the prime minister on the night of attack – the most basic and obvious decision he could imagine,” it was said.

Johnatan Reiss contribute to reporting.