Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni is struggling over the protective order in the legal battle of ‘Ends with us’

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni Legal teams fought around the proposed protective order during a 90 -minute hearing on Thursday.

The two parties were arguing about how much protection and confidentiality needed in the case. Lively Baldoni In December for sexual harassment. However, Baldoni insisted on his litigation of the vibrant “false” accused him of trying to fix his reputation after falling around the movie tour after taking control of the film.

Lively’s lawyers advocated “only lawyer’s eyes” for evidence in the case, seemingly advocating for text messages with “high individuals” that will be hidden from the public.

“There is a significant chance of irreparable damage if borderline conversations with high individuals who are not important in the case of fallen hands,” said Lively’s lawyer, Meryl Conant, claimed during the hearing, insinuating the chances of the texts to miss.

Silen Taylor Swift about vibrant, the Baldoni ‘Says Volume’ with the stars face the possible testimony: an expert

Governor claimed that there are “100 million reasons” Baldonia’s side can leak text messages due to the value of public relations.

Lively’s team focused on examples of information that should be confidential, including security measures taken to protect the actress, wife and their children. Lawyers claimed that there was no reason for anyone to know about certain security measures the family has.

Justin Baldoni’s lawyerBryan Freedman, he said it was offensive to suggest that the team would neglect a protective order from the court. The lawyer pushed himself against the “only lawyer’s eyes” mark, stating that his concern Lively had transferred the burden to defense.

Freedman also confirmed that he had no intention of discovering any information about Lively’s medical and psychological records.

Referee Lewis Liman noted if something relevant was discussed in case, the defense should be able to talk and use it. However, the judge did not decide on which protective order would be made during the hearing on Thursday.

Blake Lively Vs. Justin Baldoni: All you need to know

As you read? Click here for more news about fun

Lively and others who declared themselves in support of the actress received “violent” messages, leading the “Gossip Girl” star to ask for “increased” protection, according to a letter filed in the February 20th and received from Fox News Digital.

“As described in detail in the changed appeal of Mrs. Lively, Mrs. Lively, her family, other members of the acting line -up, various witnesses of facts and individuals who spoke publicly in favor of Mrs. Lively received violent, profane, sexy and threatening communication,” the submission states.

Click here to sign up for a bulletin for fun

Baldoni’s legal team submitted a response to Lively’s request for “increased protection” and privacy in court ahead of the hearing on Thursday.

“Considering how actively lively live parties have published a lawsuit in the media, we are surprised that we now find out that it is fiercely wanting to prevent the public from approaching material and relevant evidence,” the response said.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The Baldoni team emphasized the approval of the protective order of the court’s model, but noted that the “lawyer’s eye label” was just “a” discovery mark is not justified “.

“Although lively parties claim that the ability to indicate information AEO is appropriate because” litigation involves the claim of sexual harassment in the workplace, “… Mrs. Lively has already published alleged details about the so -called ‘harassment’ in her altered appeal that stretched to 138 pages and almost 500 items.