1 mn fewer people to provide health benefits within the frame of social welfare reform in the UK

Unlock free Digest editor

Roula Khalaf, editor of FT, chooses her favorite story in this weekly newsletter.

About 1mn will be prevented from receiving health and disability fees in accordance with social welfare reforms that have placed the Government of Sir Keira Starmer on a course to calculate with Labor MPs.

Plans aimed at saving £ 5 billion a year from an account for growing benefits in the UK, which will be discovered by work on Tuesday, and Liz Kendall’s Pension Minister will include scanning “Payment Independence” or PIP, which have been made to cover additional costs for people who cannot work due to disabilities or bad health.

According to reforms, PIP would be denied many people with mental health conditions, while others with some physical and psychiatric conditions would see that their benefits are reduced to a lower level, according to people who are referred to plans.

These changes will require voting at the House of Municipalities, people said, to throw out Starmer and his ministers against the growing choir of MPbbench, who are complained to the measures and increasing the possibility of the greatest rebellion to this day.

Dozens of work MPs have expressed serious concerns about withdrawing or reducing support to those who need it, and several ministers have made complaints with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at last week Cabinet meeting.

Still, Starmer and Kendall – who will present his green book on Tuesday – are determined to suppress consumption in the UK, which they claim is to mitigate economics and growth submission.

About 4 million to 16 to 64-year-one from 10 -am Benefits or inabilityCompared to 2.8 million in 2019, according to the Fiscal Studies Institute.

More than half of this increase stems from an increase in claims relating to mental health or behavior conditions.

Kendall defended her next reforms on Monday, saying that “there will always be people who can’t work because of the seriousness of their illness.. These people will always be protected.”

Rachael Maskell, a former member of the cabinet Labour Shadow, said attempts to convince MPs are “quite inappropriate” with the proposed scallop of the cuts: “Some of us are wondering how to install that circle.”

“If they come out with draconian measures, they will still have to go through proper consultation and can be played for everything,” she added.

Rachel Reeves, a chancellor, tries to use cuts to repair a hole in public finances caused by slow growth and growing borrowing costs.

9.9 billion. The rules say that current consumption must be covered by tax revenues by 2029-30.

About 1 mim. A smaller number of people will receive health benefits by the end of the scheduled period, mainly through changes in the criteria of acceptability for new claims, but also by re -examining existing cases, people who are drawing on the plan said.

It will also be a drastic overhaul of the system for benefits of incompetence, with an assessment of a work capacity that determines who is eligible for additional support, is expected to be completely abolished.

Kendall will also reduce the highest level of incompetent support – which provides an additional £ 416 per month – at the same time increasing the basic support rate of people who are out of work, known as Universal Credit, according to the people who are directed in the move.

Rebalancing is expected to be neutral, with the treasury planning a greater savings by reducing the highest support rate of incompetence than pumping into an increasing universal credit.

Previous media reports claimed that Kendall had planned to froze benefits for disabilities so as not to increase with inflation in the move that would probably collect several billion for the treasury.

However, some work lawmakers believe that freezing has never been a serious idea. An older MP said it was a tactic “to make it look like they made concessions, and real cuts are not so bad.”

One treasury official said the proposal was never taken seriously in the ward.

Labor Whips has taken difficult disciplinary measures taken against rebel MPs last summer after voting against the policy of well -being, and the handful was still suspended.

Another senior MP said that returnees were going through intense emotions: “There is a worried combination of fear of whip with a sense of fear because of the consequences for their voters.”