The draft was almost ready to submit, which came in less than a month. More than 150 scientists and other experts have collectively spent thousands of hours working on a report, which is the first such assessment of nature throughout the United States.
But President Trump ended the effort, started under the management of Biden, with an executive order. Thus, on January 30, the director of the project, an environmental scientist named Phil Levin, sent an E -A -spite that told members of his team that their work had been abolished.
But it was not the only e -mail he sent that day.
“This work is too important to die,” Dr. Levin wrote in a separate E -MAILA authors of the report, this one from his personal account. “The country needs what we produce.”
Now key experts who worked on a report, called a national nature assessment, reveal how to finish it and publish it outside the Government, according to interviews with nine leading authors.
“There is an incredibly unanimous broad consensus that we should continue to work,” said Howard Frumkin, professor of environmental science at the University of Washington, who led a chapter on nature effects on human health and good.
The study was intended for measuring the ways in which the countries, the leading and the wild animals of the nation were expected to change and what it means for humans.
Most of the 12 chapters were written by teams of a dozen specialists. While some were federal employees, the vast majority of authors came outside the Government – academic communities, non -profit groups and private sector – and they have already volunteered their time. Most or all teams expected to continue their work, the authors said.
The first completed draft was needed on February 11th. When researchers said the project was canceled, some almost completed their chapters and simply polished. Others were racing against Rok.
Rajat Panwar, a professor of responsible and sustainable business at Oregon State University who led a chapter on nature and the economy, was preparing diamonds for presenting his section when he received the news. He said that the recruit team saw, and still sees, work as a call to help solve one of the smallest problems of his generation, the loss of nature and biodiversity.
“The Addiction of the Economy on Nature,” the topic explored in the chapter of 6,000 words of his group, “is underrated and underestimated and underestimated,” said Dr. Panwar.
But the effort to publish beyond the Government asked the main questions that were discussed. What is the best way to post? How will the authors ensure rigor and review? Who is their target audience? Since federal employees will not be able to continue, who will pay for certain critical coordination roles? Who will ensure the supervision that came from the Federal Board of Directors?
And perhaps the most difficult question: How can a report hold the stature and impact of government estimates now that the Government will not release it?
“We just want to be sure that any product produced really has the potential to move the needle to talk, all from dinner table in individual families to the Congress Hall,” said Chris Field, director of the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University, who led the chapter about nature and climate change.
Legal issues related to ownership of work should not be a problem, said Peter Lee, a professor of rights at the California University of Davis, who specializes in intellectual ownership law and has not been involved in the effort.
“As a general rule, government works are not subject to copyright,” Mr. Lee said.
The draft is developed under the auspices of the American research program of the global change, the same federal group that oversees national climatic assessments. However, while these reports were prescribed, the nature assessment was authorized by the executive order issued by President Biden.
The project left more vulnerable. It became one of the orders for the environment from the Biden era that Mr. Trump was abolished on the first day in power. Mr. Trump also has frozen climate consumptionstarted withdrawal of the United States from the main global pact to fight climate change and launched an an an attack on wind energy while seeking to expand fossil fuels.
Until the end of January, a federal website for a national nature estimate was demolished.
“Nature supports our economy, our health and well -being, national safety and safety from fires and floods,” said Dr. Levin, former Director of the Report. “The loss of national nature assessment means that we lose important information that we need to ensure that nature and people make progress.”
Dr. Levin refused to comment on the future of the report.
Trump’s administration did not deal with questions why she canceled her effort. But Anna Kelly, a spokeswoman for the White House, said that Mr. Trump “would release American energy potential” and “at the same time ensure that our country’s land and water can enjoy the generations to come.”
Christopher Schell, Assistant Professor of Ecology at the University of California, Berkeley, and the leading author of the chapter called “Nature and equality in the US,” said that the focus on justice of the environment made the estimate of more Trump administration aim, which has attacked programs of diversity, equality and inclusion and Located workers from the Environmental Protection Office for Environmental Protection.
Biological diversity, diversity of life on Earth, decreases faster than at any time in human history, According to a significant global scientific estimate. National Nature Assessment was intended to provide a much more robust picture of the United States game condition, the authors said.
Danielle Ignace, an associate professor at the Department of Forest Resources at the University of Minnesota and the leading author of the chapter on the drivers of changes in nature, said her team felt the importance of work more strongly than ever.
“It’s a call to this reason to watch it,” said Dr. Ignace. “We won’t stop.”
