Pro-Life leaders invite Trump to reverse the position of IVF, they say that technology is not “pro-Life”

Some key activists for life ask ethical questions about the president Donald Trump Executive order for expanding access to expensive procedures in vitro fertilization (IVF), claiming that technology “is not a life” because some embryos are “destroyed” in the process.

“IVF no Solve the fundamental causes of the health crisis of infertility in America, “The founder of the live Lila Rose action wrote on X.” It is Big Pharma Bandaid, with main ethical issues, such as millions of frozen and destroyed embryos. If we want to re -do America healthy, we should invest in resolving and treating the fundamental causes of infertility. “

Trump signed an executive command on Tuesday, fulfilling a part of a key promise on a free treatment campaign for IVF for women. The command came shortly after Democrats criticized him for his role in the appointment of justice of the Supreme Court who reversed the Landmark Roe against Wade, leaving an abortion approach to every country,

Pro-Life Message Movement with great investments of these key players

IVF “offers hope to men and women who have fertility challenges,” “Executive command says, and” Americans need a reliable approach to IVF -u more accessible treatment opportunities “, as treatment costs can range from $ 12,000 to $ 25,000.

“Therefore, to support the American family, my administration policy is to ensure a reliable approach to the treatment of IVF, including the mitigation of unnecessary legal or regulatory loads to make IVF treatment more drastically more affordable,” the order said.

Patrick T. Brown, an associate at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, explained that IVF raises a unique ethical question within conservative Pro-Life movement due to the potential of technology to create a new life, which causes some cleft among some on the right.

“I think there are questions about what we do exactly with IVF, where we create something that has the potential to become a human person,” Brown said. “We were all embryos in one phase, so they deserve some respect, at least, if not the legal protection of someone or other form.”

“There are actual protective fences that need to be persecuted, not just full speed,” he added.

Brown predicted that the most likely outcome that after the White House had come up with a plan in the next three months Trump administration It can consult with experts who have long focused on IVF who are aware of ethical concerns.

“Now they allow people to choose sex or to display different genetic features in a way that most other countries do not have,” Brown said. “We are kind of” wild west “when it comes to some of these things. And it opens a can of worm for Eugenik and some of these other things that I think President Trump doesn’t really intend. But you know, you might actually go that way If we don’t care about it. “

Pro-Life activist persecuted Biden Doj responds to Trump’s pardon: “I want to hug him”

Several conservative influences on social media opposed Trump’s executive order on Tuesday.

“IVF ends more valuable lives than it creates,” and influencer Tunsa USA wrote Alex Clark on X. “Executive order of Trump president who is advocating for an extended approach only stimulates the same industry that competes with a planned parenting. More baby will be born without And right to know both of their biological parents, and it is a tragedy itself. “

Conservative commentator Liz Wheeler, who is Catholic, called IVF “awful” in another post.

“Over 90% of the children created by IVF Die, there was frozen and abandoned, destroyed because of the eugenics, experimented on or aborted. It was only 7% born. It’s terrible,” she wrote.

Allie Beth Stuckey, an evangelical Christian who hosts Podcasta Blaze “Relatable”, wrote that IVF “Anti-Maha”, referring to the Make American Healthy movement.

“It’s a perfect example of what’s wrong with most modern medicine in America,” she wrote. “Instead of coming to the root cause of infertility, masking symptoms with a ‘solution’ that is a threat Female health. The process almost always involves destruction or indefinite freezing embryo. In the United States, it is incredibly unregulated, and I am afraid that this latest Eo will only worse. “

‘Promises held’: Trump signs the executive command to ‘aggressively’ make an IVF more accessible and available

IVF is resurrected to become a high problem during the presidential campaign. In February 2024. The Supreme Court in Alabama ruled that the frozen embryo children were frozen, which led to the paused services of the IVF state. Rules Alabama Kay Ivey Later codified access to IVF services in state law a few months later.

“When frozen embryo defrost and prepare for transfer, there is a very small possibility that they can damage them or destroy them and therefore not successfully transferred,” wrote Joanne Rosen, professor of practice in health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University, wrote in a blog post after the verdict of a high state. “Even fresh embryos can be damaged and cannot be transmitted. So, there was a real concern because of legal consequences, since these embryos, you in vitro embryo, declared a person according to the Alabama Law.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The head of the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) wrote in the September post that, although he and Trump, they do not oppose IVF, “We will explore the alarming fall of fertility.”

“We will evaluate research that implies chemicals such as glyphosate, BPA, heavy metal, xenoestrogen, chemicals that fit into endocrine and so on,” he wrote. “We will also consider nutritional factors. Why are sperm numbers decreasing from year to year? Why do girls reach puberty so early? Why are there so many couples of infertile? The US people deserve answers, and we will give them. So IVF – but this is a question so bigger than IVF. “

Fox News Digital spoke to the White House for comment.