Lebanon a cautious Israeli army will not fulfill the deadline | Israel attacks Lebanese news
The Israeli army expected that they would remain in strategic locations despite the retreat of the retreat until February 18th.
Lebanon watches the action of the Israeli army carefully as the deadline for pulling his troops from the south of the earth is approaching.
The Beirut government expressed concern on Monday that Israel would not move all its forces from Lebanon on the agreed period of February 18th.
Concerns, expressed in the midst of a raft of small attacks of Israeli forces, illustrates the fragility of the ceasefire between Israel and the Lebanese group of Hezbollah.
“We are afraid that the withdrawal will not be reached tomorrow,” said President Lebanon Joseph Aoun, according to his office.
The warning came in the middle of several reports of attacks Aided by Lebanon – the usual tactic of the Israeli army ahead of the termination of hostilities.
Drone hit a car in the port city of Sidon, the deepest of Israeli numerous attacks in Lebanon Ever since the fire interruption agreement has entered into force at the end of November.
The strike, near the checkpoint of the Lebanese army, was killed by an official Hamas who led the Lebanon Group Operation Department, the Israeli army said.
Zein Khodr Al Jazeera, reporting from the scene, said “Israel is acting with a little restraint.”
The drone also lowered the grenade on the main square of the southern town of Kfarchoub, while lit by houses in the border town of Odaisseh, towards the Lebanese National News Agency.
Ramzi Kaiss of Human Rights Watch said that “Israeli deliberate demolition of civilian homes and infrastructure” enabled “many residents impossible to return home.
Partial withdrawal?
Israel and Hezbollah agreed on a tribute-which was in force on November 27-would stop the multi-month war, during which Israel launched land surgery against Leban Chief Hassan Nasrallah.
According to the agreement, the Israeli army was supposed to withdraw from South Lebanon over a period of 60 days, while the Lebanese army was supposed to be deployed to Hezbollah Heartland together with the United Nations Peace Forces.
The deadline, which fell at the end of January, was later extended to February 18th.
Meanwhile, Hezbollah was supposed to pull north of the Litani River – about 30 km (20 miles) from the border – and disassemble any of the remaining military infrastructure in the south.
However, last week, Israel accused the Lebanese armed group of not adhering to the agreement and said that it was not planned to withdraw completely in the short term, but instead left the troops at five key locations.
The Lebanese parliamentary speaker Nabih Berri, an ally of Hezbollah, said that he had received the news from Washington that Israel would remain in those five locations, which Lebanon had rejected.
“What we hear from Lebanese officials is that Israel will withdraw from some villages, but will remain in strategic locations on the hill just a few meters in Lebanon,” Khodrod Al Jazeera reported.
It is assumed that the positions that Israel intends to hold will offer military control through South Lebanon.
Karim Bitar, a lecturer in the Middle East East Study at the Paris Institute of Political Studies (Sciences PO), said: “It seems that there is a tacit if not a express US agreement on the extension of the withdrawal period.”
