Ind vs eng: Ravicharndran ashwin interrupts silence on Indian controversial earthquake to replace the brain earthquake in the fourth T20I

admin02/02/2025

0 0 2 minutes read

IndiaDecision on introduction Harshit wound As an earthquake of replacement for Shitamo dube During the fourth T20I against England in Full He encouraged a great discussion in the crisis world.

Controversy about a sharper switching on wounds as a replacement for a brain earthquake

In the match, Dube played a major role, breaking 53 of 34 balls, as India set up a competitive total of 181/9. However, in the finals of several Indian inserts, Dube hit the helmet on the helmet in the helmet Craig Overton The ejector, forcing him to leave the field under the earthquake protocols. In a move that has been drawn since then, India replaced him Harshit woundMedium fast bowler, instead of a comprehensive stock.

The wound made the current influence, delivering 33 to 33 at his debut for T20I. Its key breakthroughs – including Liam Livingstone, Jacob Bethell and Craig Overton -He stood up India Bowl England for 166, securing a win of 15 runs. With this victory, India is in the series in the series ahead of the last game in Mumbai, in the series before 3-1. English captain Jos Buttler He did not refrain from testing the moves of India, openly stating that the wound was not a similar replacement for the depths.

Attitude Ravicharndran Ashwin about India’s decision

Indian spin legend Ravicharndran Ashwin He has now expressed his strong disapproval of the decision, criticizing both the match officers and the treatment of the situation in the Indian team. Speaking on his YouTube channel, Ashwin did not change his words, comparing the decision to the IPL player’s rule, not an international crisket regulation.

“The game was over. India caught another series at home. T20I was a real jog victory. What was this game? It was like a replica IPL. Supersub was there and the game was playing with a hit player,” Ashwin noticed, expressing his disbelief for the situation.

He further related to the 2020 earthquake incident in Canberri, where Yuzvendra Chahal replaced Ravandra Jadej after the latter suffered a brain earthquake. Ashwin pointed out that at least in that case, Spinner replaced another Spinner, making him a reasonable decision. In contrast, bringing Pacera for a solemn crowd like Dubao looked completely unjustified.

“The whole discussion is about how Harshit the wound came as a replacement for the brain earthquake for shimid dube. Have we forgot to be an international match and playing the IPL match? I can understand. It happened in the past. Ravandra Jadeja has been overwhelmed in Canberri, and Yuzvedra Chahal came in as a replacement. said the 38-year-old.

Also read: Did India follow the ICC rules replaced by Shimam Dubaa with Harshit wound during the fourth T20I against England? Explained

Ashwin’s perspective on Ramandeep Singh as a possible replacement

Ashwin strongly criticized the match officials, claiming that Ramandeep SinghA comprehensive blow, was the perfect replacement for the depth, but overlooked it. Ashwin further emphasized that this decision set a dangerous precedent because it could allow teams to take advantage of the earthquake rule in future matches.

“Here, Harshit came for Shium Dube. There is no role of Indian or English team. If there is no one on the team, then you can say that Harshit wound can hit a little and shimacam will be a little crumpled. We brought it in. I don’t understand. should look at this in this “ Ashwin concluded.