Hamas accuses Israel of violating the truce, says he will stop letting go hostage
Palestinian militant group Hamas announced on Monday that it would stop posting Israeli hostages until further notice because of what was said to be Israeli violations of the dedication agreement, which increases the risk of re -presentation of the conflict.
The unexpected announcement comes due to growing doubts about already fragile trucks, even if the families of Israeli hostages invite the government to adhere to the agreement, and the Gazans try to rebuild their lives in the broken enclave.
Hamas was supposed to let some Israeli hostage on Saturday be exchange for Palestinian prisoners and other Palestine held in Israeli custody, as happened in the last three weeks.
The ABU Ubaid’s military wing spokesman said that, since the truce came into force on January 19, Israel delayed the displaced Palestinians to return to the northern Gaza, they were targeting Gazani with shelling and shooting and stopping relief with the introduction of territories.
The appearance has been mainly held since January 19, although there were some incidents in which the Palestinians killed Israeli shooting. The flow of humanitarian aid in Gaza has increased from a ceasefire, say assistance agencies.
However, Ubaida said that the next scheduled hostage edition will be delayed on Saturday until Israel is in accordance with the fire interruption agreement and “compensate for in recent weeks.”
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said that Hamas’s announcement had violated the fire interruption agreement and that he had instructed the army to prepare at the highest level of willingness in Gaza and to defend the Israeli community.
Israeli army said on Monday It increases the “level of readiness” and enhances its forces in the southern command of defense missions, the statement said. It was said to be delaying the leave for combat soldiers and operational units within the command.
The Israeli official said the Prime Minister maintains security counseling. The safety cabinet of selected ministers, including defense, national security and external affairs, met on Tuesday morning, the official said.
Two Egyptian security sources said on Monday, Reuters mediators feared the breakdown of the fire interruption agreement. Qatar and Egypt made an agreement together with the United States.
A group representing families with hostages invited mediators to protect the agreement, while another group representing Israeli military veterans accused the Government of intentionally sabotaging an agreement on the termination of fire.
Keep in conversations about interrupting fire for phase 2
So far, 16 of the 33 hostages have been published in the first 42-day phase of the agreement, they have returned home, as well as five Thai hostages returned in an unplanned edition.
In exchange, Israel released hundreds of prisoners and detainees, ranging from prisoners who served life sentences for deadly attacks to Palestinians detained during the war and kept without accusation.
But Hamas accused Israel of dragging his legs when allowing help in Gaza, one of the conditions of the first phase of the agreement, dismissed Israel as untrue.
In return, Israel accused Hamas of not respecting the order in which hostages were to be published and orchestrated public representations of abuse before the great crowds when handed over to the Red Cross.
Earlier, the Office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the Israeli delegation returned from the interview of the Katar fire interruption, due to the increasing doubt over the Egyptian and Catharic processes that took over the war.
There were no direct details about the reason for the return from the conversation, which were intended for the basis for the second phase of the multi -phase agreement on the interruption of fire and the exchange of hostages for the prisoner reached last month.
The Palestinian official close to the discussions said that progress kept distrust between the two pages, which accused each other of violating the trial conditions.
No right to return
In the meantime, US President Donald Trump said that Palestinians in Gaza will not have the right to return to his plan for the American “ownership” on war -destroyed territory, otherwise with other officials in his administration who sought to claim that Trump had only called for the The Temporary relocation of its population.
Less than a week after it has floated its plan for the US download control From Gaza and turn it to the “Middle East Riviera”, Trump, in an interview with Bret Baier Fox News, which was supposed to be aired on Monday, “No, no”, when asked if Palestinians in Gaza would have the right to return to the territory.
It comes to increase the pressure on the Arab states, especially US allies Jordan and Egypt, to take over the Palestinians from Gaza, who claim the territory as part of the future homeland.
“We will build safe communities, a little further away from where, where all these danger is,” Trump said. “In the meantime, I would own it. Imagine it as the development of real estate for the future. It would be a beautiful piece of land. No big money spent.”
The Arab nations sharply criticized Trump’s proposal, and Trump’s last words were published the day before hosted by Jordan’s King Abdullah II at the White House on Tuesday. In addition to concern about endangering the long-term goals of the double solution of Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Egypt and Jordan have privately provoked security concerns for greeting a large number of additional refugees to their countries.
After Trump’s initial comments last week, the secretary of the Karolina Leavitt White House and US Secretary -General Marco Rubius insisted that Trump only wants Palestinians to move from Gaza “temporarily” and for a “temporary” period to allow waste to be removed, disposal of unlucky rulebooks and renovation.
Trump did not exclude the deployment of American troops last week to help ensure the territory, but at the same time insisted that US funds would not pay for gauze renovation, asking the basic questions about the nature of his plan.