Experts dispute the evidence used in condemnation of nurses Lucy Letby for killing 7 newborns at Hospital in UK

London – Experts challenged medical evidence used to condemn the British nurses Lucy Letby from the murder of seven newborns And trying to kill seven others, the doctor who led the exam said on Tuesday. Dr. Shoo Lee, a retired infant from Canada, said a group of 14 doctors concluded that infants had died of natural causes or poor medical care.

“In short, ladies and gentlemen, we didn’t find murder,” Lee said at a London press conference.

Letby, 35, is Serving more life sentences without a chance of letting go after being convicted of murder and tried to kill while working as a newborn at the Countess Chester Hospital in the northwest of England between June 2015 and June 2016.

Defense lawyer Mark McDonald said there is now “overwhelming evidence” that Letby have been wrongly convicted.

It was a second press conference that McDonald partly held to challenge Dr. Dewi Evans, who was a key prosecutor’s expert.

Prosecutors said Letby left a small mark when she killed her babies, and in some cases she injected the air into her bloodstream or stomach, causing the embolism. But Lee said Evans misinterpreted his 1989 academic work on Embolia.

Lee said he had gathered a prestigious group of international medical experts who voluntarily examined 17 Baby Letby’s records charged with injuries or killings.

Evans diagnosed babies by air embolism in the lack of finding another cause of death, Lee said. But Lee said that the embolism was very rare, and the change of skin color described at the trial was not in line with what is seen when there is an embolism.

“The idea that these babies can be diagnosed with air embolism because they collapsed and there were skin colors, there is really no evidence,” Lee said.

Letby has already lost two complaint offers. Her lawyer filed a request on Monday to receive a criminal audit committee to examine his belief, which could lead to another shooting in the appeal.

A separate public investigation into a hospital failure that brought babies to be harmed several times, it should be concluded next month. This probe does not examine the evidence used to condemn Letby, but is focused on the responsibility of hospital staff and managing and watching the parents are treated.

During the trial, Senior Prosecutor Nicola Wyn Williams claimed that Letby removed the support of a baby breathing and that the doctor found nothing to do anything while the child fought,

Williams claimed that Letby then removed the breathing tube twice in the next few hours, “in an attempt to cover his marks and suggest that the first celebration was accidental.”

Dr. Ravi Jayaram, a pediatrician at the hospital, told the jurors that he had not seen “no evidence” that Letby did anything to help the child when he entered and saw him standing next to the infant’s incubator.

In that case, Letby told the jury that she did not remember any such event, and she had always denied the commitment of any criminal offense she had been convicted for.