Unlock Bulletin on White House Hour FREE
Your guide for what American choices 2024 means for Washington and the world
Brussels saves new instructions for prohibited use of artificial intelligence according to its significant legislation that regulates technology, encouraging the implementation of its AI Law, even while Donald Trump warns of retaliation to target US EU technological companies.
The law adopted in 2023 is considered to be the most comprehensive world regulatory frame for Ai. Provisions for prohibiting certain applications, such as scraping the Internet to create a face recognition database, have entered into force on Sunday.
The European Commission should publish key guidelines on how these rules should apply companies on Tuesday, officials said. Further provisions targeting large AI models and AI products that represent a high risk of users, such as health care, will be derived between now and 2027.
The constant pressure on the implementation of the rules comes in the midst of a wider European discussion that the aggressive block should implement its digital rules despite the fierce aversion of major technological companies supported by the new US president.
Trump threatened to target Brussels in response to fines imposed on US companies. EU has already moved to “Come” probes In companies such as Apple, Meta and Google according to other legislation aimed at protecting the continent digital markets.
“In Brussels, he definitely worries that the new US president will stimulate the EU pressure on AI law to ensure that US companies do not have to have too many bureaucracy or potentially even fine,” said Patrick Van Eecke, Kopedic Lawyer’s Cooley’s Global Cyber Data and Private Practice.
The law requires companies to build “high risk” and systems to be more transparent in how to build and use AI models. Those behind the most powerful models face additional requirements, such as risk assessment. Companies that do not comply with the law face great fines and may be banned from the EU.
Brussels’s ambitions to position itself as a “global center for a reliable AI” have long since caused large technological groups. Companies like Facebook owner Meta explicitly warned that a strict European regulation could stifle AI investments and innovations.
Large technological companies are opposed to the “heavy” provisions of the AI AI Law on providing more transparency for data. These include rules that allow third parties to approach the Code of AI models to assess the risk, as well as the exceptions of AI laws from some security rules for open code and smaller start-up companies, the person close to the procedure.
Earlier this month, Trump Warned that Brussels considered any moves of US companies as “a form of taxation..
During his first week in power, Trump made $ 500 billion AI infrastructure project Named Stargate led by Japanese Softbank and San Francisco Openi. He criticized the efforts to regulate AI, signing executive commands that eliminate many protective stripes over technology development.
One senior EU official involved in the implementation of the AI AI AI told the Financial Times that the Commission acknowledged Trump’s curved threat and pressure of the US, but insisted that the law that passed would not change.
“What we can do is ensure that what is possible and innovation as possible, which is what we are currently doing,” the official said. “There is flexibility in the rules and we look at how we use it.”
From Trump’s inauguration, the narrative around technological regulation has also moved in Brussels, said Caterina Rodelli, an EU policy analyst at Access Digital Rights Group Access Now. The group lobbied the prohibitions of the AI law to be stronger. “What we thought was a closed job really wasn’t,” she said.
“We see the space for regulators to release their approach to the implementation of the AI law, and the prohibition implementation will be the first test for testing,” Rodelli said, adding that there would be a risk that a new deregulation approach would reduce the rules while they were basically pointless.
The EU prohibitions announced on Sunday were clear, she said the person is close to the process, and many large technological companies are already in harmony.
The cause of additional tension in Brussels are negotiations around the Code of Practice for AI of General Purpose, which affect powerful AI models like Google’s twin and Openai’s GPT-4, said the person. The Code will describe in detail how companies in practice can implement the rules of AI Law.
Negotiations, which include hundreds of participants and are coordinated by the AI-SI Commission’s Office, will end in April.
