Democrat asks if fewer women are in production because it sounds too male
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8f1e/f8f1ef2c4deaecf3b7a8b48c012cc4353e2b200b" alt=""
During the hearing on Wednesday, a Democratic MP in the house He said the reason why fewer women involved in production could be because the term has the word “man”.
“I met a manufacturing company yesterday, but they also deal with young people more engaged in production,” said envoy Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., During the store, production and shop hearing a pododora called “AI in production: securing American leadership in production and the next generation of technologies.”
Schakowsky continued, saying he thought there were fewer women in production because the word itself sounds too male.
Washington, DC – July 18: Envoy Jan Schakowsky (D -il) speaks at a press conference on July 18, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Photo Jemal Countess/Getty Images in return Fund for Court Action)
“So, I asked them, so how many students who apply and want to do it? How many women are there?” Schakowsky said, adding that they told her it was at least 13%.
“It was a small number,” she said. “And you mentioned that you are trying to involve more women in production. I just wonder if it just sounds a name making like a guy.”
In a post on X that contains objections, Tail. Gabe Evans, roll.who also said on a pododbor, he said, “Us: Let’s take the way and bring back jobs to America. Democrats:” Production “is a sexist expression against women!”
Scott Eastwood Company is proud to promote American manufacturers: ‘We used to make things’
Workers check the production of electronic chips at the production workshop of the Radio Frequent and Electric Devices Company in Chongqing in China, May 9, 2023.
According to a Report 2022. From the US Ministry of Trade, women make up 47% of US workforce, but only 30% worked in production.
Click here to get the Fox News app