Former Kripket team player in India Aakash Chopra spoke about the rule of replacement for the brain earthquake after the fourth T20I against the English national cricket team. He said there should be clarity because it could problematize India at some ICC events.
The Indian National Cricket team has made a huge replacement for the brain earthquake during the fourth T20I series against the England National Crickket team. This followed after Shimam Dube managed a huge blow to the head during the last Indian insertion when Jamie Overton was ball.
Decision to play Harshit Wounds instead of Dubao has almost attracted many reactions
Ramandeep singh was expected to be on the ground, because, according to a replacement for the brain earthquake, only a similar replacement was allowed. However, in what was a huge surprise, Harshit Wound was added to the team, and Fast Bowler was debut for the Indian National Crushk Tim.
The decision to play Harshit wounds instead of Dubo has almost attracted many reactions of fans and experts. Many thought it was not a replacement “like”. Pacer proved to be an exchanger of the Games while choosing three shots and helped India win the National Cricket team on the match.
Instead of crying offense, then it is best to make noise now – aakash chopra
Aakash Chopra spoke about this rule and asked some questions, saying that India could be at the reception area in some key ICC events. He said that instead of throwing that time, it was better to have answers now. Going out to his Twitter account, he said:
“This’ Earthquake Sub ‘rule with a clause’ like ‘like’ has opened Pandora’s box. The substitution must allow the match judge. A team that demands that it has to propose a name/s. Yesterday’s decision left some questions unanswered – say if Tilak got a subbed – it would be okay to bring the Sundar in another ubaca?
“If Abhishek got a subbed – can India replace it with Jadej/Axar as a bowler in another insert? Setting up these questions now, because India could be at the end of the income in the future … Say in the ICC knockout … and instead of crying The foul then … it is best to make a noise now. “
This’ earthquake ‘rule with a clause’ like ‘like’ opened Pandora’s box. The substitution must allow the referee of the match. A team that requires that it must propose the name/s.
Yesterday’s decision left some questions unanswered –
Say Tilak got a subbed – it would be okay …– Aakash Chopra (@Cricketaakash) 1. February 2025
In fact, we played with 12 people – Aakash Chopra
Aakash Chopra also acknowledged that the Indian National Cricket team used the wrong plot. He emphasized that Harshit the wound that came instead of Shiid Dubua was not a similar replacement, adding that the side of Suryakumum was run by Yadav with 12 people. He added:
“Occasionally a bowl at 115 to 120 km / h. This is a reality”
“Shimamo Dubea pulled it, scored 53 rides, and when it was a row for a bowl, Harshit wounded the whole four adds and picked up three shots, and he won the game for India. In fact, we played with 12 people.”
