England National Crickket team Skipper Jos Buttler was not a happy camper after India National Cricsket Team Pacer Harshit Wound was allowed as a replacement of an earthquake for shimid dube in the fourth T20I.
Jos Buttler was frustrated by a decision, and asked for explanation by Judge Javagal Srinath for Harshit Wounds, replacing Shimitam Duba in Team India XI.
Huge controversy in India against England 4. T20I
The Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium in Pune was hosted by the fourth T20I from a five -game series between India and England. During the last first insertion, the versatile Shimamo Dubu suffered a brutal blow to the helmet from the delivery of Jamie Overton.
The incident literally shook Dub and failed to take over the pitch in another ubac. As a result, India opted for an earthquake replacement.
Only replacement similar to brain replacement is allowed, and India struck a versatile ramandeep singh on the bench, which corresponds to the definition of replacement similar to Shimid Dube.
However, to all the surprise, Pacer Harshit Wound entered Dube’s replacement. The wound is a pure pacer that possesses a certain ability to hit, and it enters the side by India an extra advantage.
This is not a replacement similar-jos buttler
The captain of England, Jos Buttler, looked visibly frustrated as things came out on the field, and when he spoke with the media after the match, he set his position very clear.
Jos Buttler said the wound was not a similar replacement for Dube and that he brutally dug into Team India. He added that they did not advise them before the decision was made and questioned the match judge for allowing Swap to happen.
“It’s not a replacement similar to which we don’t agree with it. Either Shimam will put about 25mph with a ball or Harshit really improved his hitting. It’s part of the game and we really should have left to win in the match but we don’t agree With a decision, “he said.
“There was no counseling [with us]. This is something I thought while I went out for blows – who is harmed for? They said it was a replacement for a brain earthquake, which I obviously didn’t agree with. This is not a replacement similar to similar. They said the referee of the match made a decision. We had no words in it or any part of it. But we will ask Javagal [Srinath] Some questions just to get clarity about it. “
As I said, that was not the whole reason why we didn’t win the match – Jos Buttler
However, Jos Buttler, as a good sport, further said that the involvement of a wound in India XI, who chose three large wicks, was not the whole reason for the defeat defeat, but required more clarification than the game officials.
“As I said, that was not the whole reason why we didn’t win the match. We had our chances of winning the game we could still take. But I would love to have a little more clarity on it,” Buttler said.
Also, former crickets like Kevin Pietersen, Michael Vaughan, Aakash Chopra and Nick Knight asked serious questions about replacement and scored officers.
