Unlock free Digest editor
Roula Khalaf, editor of FT, chooses her favorite story in this weekly newsletter.
Get Britain again! In any conversation about the UK’s ability to construct large infrastructure projects for strengthening growth and a non-needy runway on Heathrow at the top of the missed opportunity. The efforts to expand the center of Western London date back to decades.
That does it Obviously Meta for Chancellor in UK Rachel Reeveswho wants to convince investors and companies that her government is pro-Rest. The difficulty is to convince them that the third runway can actually be delivered.
There are sound economic arguments on paper that support the spread. Heathrow is not just the most prominent airport in the UK, and it went to about 83.8 million passengers in 2024, but is the largest port in the country.
Even with his current two runways, he continued to increase passenger numbers in November, breaking the new record. However, further growth, through small changes such as the reassuring of airlines to switch to larger nozzles, will have restrictions. Flights are limited to 480,000 per year. The slots to start new routes are limited; The airport operates with a capacity of 99 percent.
There are also soft advantages. Almost every passenger will have a story about delays or the cancellation of a flight in Heathrow – partly a symptom of his capacity limitations.
True, there are five other “London” airports that can be selected by airlines if Southend is included in Essex. But Heathrow is a favorite for long transmitters, as transmission traffic makes certain routes economically sustainable.
In reality, however, barriers Stay huge. The previous work administration approved the third runway at the 2009 airport. The shovel is yet to hit the ground.
Even if the heavy care for the environment campaigns and the residents of Western London could be removed, the cost and that they could be funded without passengers and airlines Balkans are still a big unknown. Even in 2014, when Heathrow predicted the cost of approximately £ 14 billion, others considered this underwater. Airline companies are cautious about how much charges they would be transferred to passengers – they had to increase to fund a refund that private investors would demand.
Of course, big, tickling projects have been violated before. The nuclear power plants in the UK had a similar stop history, which ended in 2016 when the Theresa May Government gave an advantage for the Hinkley Point C factory in southwestern England. But now over time and overly budget, this may not be a comparison that the Government wants to make.
What is obvious, however, this is not really about short-term growth at all-about growth perception. With British companies deep gloomy About the consequences of changes in budget taxes this year, it is a little wonder that the chancellor understands any lever to start endorphins.
