Four mayors of the City of Sanctuary are preparing to avoid the ‘unpleasant’ testimony of the congress
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a61d/7a61d8f0a297545996adb473845871a98c6d2cd3" alt=""
Mayors of Boston, Chicago, Denver and New York are preparing to hear high roles before Committee on Home Supervision and Government.
“The mayors of the shrines owe an explanation for the US people for city policies that endanger public security and violate the Federal Law on Immigration by releasing dangerous criminal illegal foreigners on the streets,” said the President of the Home for Supervision and Government Reforms James Comer, R-Ky.
The hearing, which will take place before a full committee, comes because they are the so -called shrine of cities, jurisdictions that limit cooperation with the federal immigration authorities, have become under increasing supervision than after after President Donald Trump regained control of the White House in January.
Although Trump seemingly quickly made the situation on the southern border, attention turned to her promised efforts on mass deportation, a process that can be helped if state and local agencies work a hand in hand with federal authorities.
New York Mayor Eric Adams, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Mayor of Boston Michelle Wu and Denver Mayor Mike Johnston. (Getty Images)
However, some cities have taken the opposite approach for years, refusing to adhere to federal measures of implementation, such as custody that have been put on illegal immigrants by the US immigration and customs implementation agency.
These sanctuary policies have often created controversy, mostly after a handful of high crimes he has committed illegal immigrants who were allowed to suffer the deportation procedure.
“These reckless policies in cities and countries with democrats across our nation have led to too many tragedies that can be prevented,” Comer said in a statement. “Also endanger ICE agents who are forced to take more difficult executive actions in jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with the federal immigration authorities.”
Now the mayors of the four of the largest cities of the shrine will try to justify their policies before what could be a hostile Congress, with one report from Politico noticing That the mayors would ask to bypass the type of “unpleasant” episode that scored several presidents Ivy League who testified to anti -Semitism on their campuses in 2023.
The report states that all four mayors cooperated with counselors and lawyers and prepared themselves to reduce documents on the eve of the hearing on Wednesday, and the thought that the President of the University of Pennsylvania Liz Magill was overthrown after his appearance at 2023, as they wanted to avoid similar wrong steps.
New York Mayor Eric Adams. (Nyc.gov)
Hearing could be able to pollute the political future of Chicago Brandon Johnson, New York Eric AdamsBoston’s Michelle Wu and Denver’s Mike Johnston.
However, the report of politics notes that not all mayors will be so quickly rejecting their support for the Laws of Refuge.
“I just want to make sure people understand that [this is] A city that established immigrants and migrants who had been enslaved earlier, “Johnson told reporters last week when he spoke of Chicago.” It is a global capital of the world, and we will continue to appear in our best. “
In the meantime, Adams could have tried to instruct his recent cooperation, including his decision to sign an executive order that enabled ICE agents Rikers Island in New York prison.
This move was drawn to the anger of the G
Just as the answers sit with the board members remains to be seen, although Comer has promised that four mayor will be pressed on the answers.
Ambassador James Comer, R-Ky (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“Politics in Boston, Chicago, Denver and New York are prioritized by criminal illegal aliens of the American people,” Comer said in a statement. “This is unacceptable and their leaders must be responsible. We will press these mayors to answer and examine measures to implement the Federal Immigration Law.”