Parents lose their appeal in the event that the school over the notification of gender identity is
Massachusetts’ parents hope to take their case before the Supreme Court of the US after the Federal Court ruled that they did not have a constitutional right to be informed of their child’s gender transition at school.
In the verdict on February 18, US Appeal Court For the first round, he supported the dismissal of a lower court in a lawsuit, first filed by his parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestra 2022 against public schools Ludlow.
The lawsuit accuses school staff at Paul R. Baird High School in Ludlow, Massachusetts, to secretly encourage her daughter to adopt a new name and various gender pronouns while at school.
Parents claim that school policy of non -educational policy, which holds a requested gender identity of the student, unless the student does not agree, violates their parental rights protected by a clause on the procedure Fourteenth amendment.
The judge rejects a lawsuit for a parent for work policy at school, Scolds district: ‘Failure’
The parents lost a lawsuit in the federal court this month, challenging the policy of the Massachusetts district, which confirmed and hid the birth of their child. (East with Getty/AP Photo)
“[The Ludlow School Committee and implicated educators] exceeded the boundaries of legitimate pedagogical concerns and usurped a role [the plaintiffs] Other parents in the city of Ludlow to direct their children’s education and upbringing, they make medical and mental health decisions for their children and promote and preserve family privacy and integrity, “the lawsuit said.
Vernadette Ramirez Broyles, President and General Advisor for Campaign for Children and Parental Rights, represented her parents in court and said that they plan to pray the US Supreme Court to review the case.
“We are very disappointed and sincerely upset by this decision,” Broyles told Fox News Digital. “I truly believe parents across the country, via MassachusettsOf all political stripes, this will be upset. “
According to the lawsuit, the students of Baird High School received a biographical video by a school librarian who asked them to include their pronouns. After that, the prosecutor’s daughter began to receive the “unwanted” LGBTQ video proposals on her school computer, which is why she began to question her gender identity and sexuality, according to a lawsuit.
LGBT activists and their supporters gather in support of the transgender people on the stairs of New York City Hall on October 24, 2018, New York. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
After the teacher informed her parents that her daughter had confided in her depression, self-esteem problems and confusion about her sexuality, the parents thanked the teacher and sent e-mail to teachers and school administrators to inform them to seek private counseling for their child. The parents directly sent school officers to have no private conversations with their daughter about the matter.
Unknown to the parent, her daughter later sent an email to the school advisor to say that he was “gender” and asked to invite her with a new name and pronouns while at school.
Parents claim that various school officials – librarian, principal, advisor and supervisor – violated their request by confirming and privately advising the student about her gender identity, without their knowledge or consent, aligning with the policy of the non -inflammatory of the district.
Over thousands of school districts in the entire country have gender -identity non -inflammatory policies, says parents who defend education. (East)
The Council with 3 judges of the first round of the court, fully made up of democratic presidential names, ran into the Ludlow School.
The Council has ruled that the policy of the defense district “does not limit parental rights in the way the courts have recognized as a violation of guarantees of the substantive procedure”.
The verdict recognized Parents’ rights to “be informed by the oi of the focused, significant aspects of their child’s life,” but added that these rights were “not limitless”.
“Parents cannot refer to the Clausal on the procedure to create a preferred educational experience for their child at a public school,” the government said.
Panel rejected the argument of parents that school procedures were to treat medical or mental health and claimed that discussions about his native identity with the student were within the ability of the school to make “curricular and administrative decisions”.
Parents across the state have filed lawsuits against school districts to conceal the gender identity of students from their parents. (Fox News Digital)
The judges claimed that Ludlow’s protocol followed the guidelines submitted by the Commonwealth (TA) elementary and secondary education department, advising schools on how to obey state laws against discrimination of gender identity in public schools.
AND Ten leadership Proposes school officers located the gender identity of the student to feel safe and supported and ask for their consent before notifying parents if they are 14 years old or older.
“If a student is under the age of 14 and is not yet in the ninth grade, the student parent (himself) has the authority to decide on the publication and other issues of student records,” the guidelines say.
Broyles told Fox News Digital that there were several problems with this defense.
First, the guidelines of the Department of Education were voluntary, so schools didn’t ask him, she said. Second, it did not apply in this case because students were under the age of 14, and third, these guidelines still have to be interpreted in the light of the American Constitution.
She claimed that the judgment of the court had expanded the authority of school officers because of family “personal, intimate decisions on mental health.”
Click here for the latest news and culture news
Parents’ lawyers Massachusetts Stephen Foota and Mariss Silveststra claimed that the protocol for not undergoing gender identity, confirming the gender identity of students without counseling with their parents, an unconstitutional intervention of mental health. (East)
“Effective, parents lose their child’s upbringing ability if they decide to send their children to public schools who pay in taxes. This may not be a standard for the first round children,” she said.
The lawsuit claimed that the school officers also applied a gender identity protocol to their 12-year-old son, who also began using a different name and pronouns at about the same time of these events. However, the decision of the Federal Court focused only on the younger child, saying that there are “scarce relevant details” that were provided specific to the older sister of students.
The Massachusetts Family Institute also represented his parents in court.
Prosecutor lawyers Ludlow did not respond to comment requests.
David Lawless, lawyer of the Ludlow School School Committee, called the first round decision “a characteristic thoughtful and good moody opinion”, ” Said Reuters.
The case is one of several cases at the national level Parents sue the school district Through their gender identity policies that conceal the child’s transgender identity from the parent.
Click here to get the Fox News app
According to conservative educational guards who defend education, there are at least 1,195 school districts In 37 countries and Washington, DC, which have policies that explicitly state that school officers “may or should maintain a transgender status of students hidden from their parents.”
President Trump has signed an executive order in January, referring to the removal of federal funding for “illegally and discriminatory treatment and indoctrination in K-12 schools, including based on gender ideology and discriminatory capital ideology.”
Reuters contributed to this report.
