A group for abortion research is opposed to the demands of state reporting in the midst of ‘weapons’ by the legislators
“Enemy Political Climate” Trump Administration means that states have to “reconsider” their abortion reporting requirements and “vigorously oppose new ones,” the leading state states abortion research institute. But one pro-life activist told Fox News Digital such a move would be a “serious mistake”.
Guttmacher Institute Policy Analysis Report Posted this month concluded that “the advantage of reporting about abortion of state abortion no longer surpasses the risks, a shift that is likely to accelerate as against abortion Politics donors double the criminal approaches to collecting data, using the resulting data to further limit the rights to abortion and access. “
“The adoption of the application for abortion reports for purely political reasons and their increasing weapons against patients and services providers are clear indications that the damage to this mandatory data collection is now outnumbered by its benefits,” researchers for an abortion group said. “To prevent further damage, Politician donors on All levels of government should work to eliminate existing reporting requirements and vigorously opposed with a new one, together with each attempt to connect federal funding for abortion reporting. “
FDA chief lawyer who defended access to abortion pills under Biden to resign to work
The Guttmacher Institute invites the state to “review” their conditions for reporting on abortion during the second Trump expression.
Guttmacher, which is considered to be golden standard for accurate abortion statistics because it provides comprehensive data and receives more reporting than federal Disease Control and Prevention Centers (CDC), he recommended that, instead of completely removing the reporting, state -based policy creators should implement the voluntary form of data collection.
Pro-Life advocates complain to Guttmacher’s recommendation.
“The reporting of abortions deals with state abortion would be a serious mistake,” said Mia Steupert, an associate of the researcher at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, a pro-Life research group, in a Fox News Digital statement.
“Given that Dobbs set the authority to bring the protection of unborn children in the hands of the American people and their elected representatives at the federal and state levels, it is crucial to have access to good information so that the impact of these miscarriages can be evaluated,” Stepert said, referring to the 2022 verdict, which canceled Roe v. Wade.
The Law of Clinton ‘Armed’ by Biden against Pro-Lifer must go, Pence Group persuades House Gop
Reporting about the number of abortions is important data for public creators of politics, the Professors of Pro-Life say in response to the Guttmacher Institute. (Darin Oswald/Idaho Statesman/Tribune News Service via Getty Images.)
The normative practice of collecting abortion data comes primarily from countries who report their number to the CDC. The data is then assembled to give a recording of how many abortions there are throughout the country, an era of the mother and how far it was. However, although most do so, not every state requires that abortion providers, hospitals and other medical providers to report their number.
Currently, 46 countries and the Columbia district have some form of abortion reporting, the Institute states. California, Maryland, Michigan and New Jersey do not require reporting.
“Even CDC agrees That accurate abortion data is important for public health in terms of measuring unintentional pregnancy and monitoring changes in clinical practice, “Steupert said.” The end of state reporting demands would give a monopoly monopoly lobby to reporting abortions, leaving the American people in the dark about the terrible abortion reality. “
Information collected in Abortion reports It varies from the state, but generally includes details such as the name of the medical institution and clinicians involved in the abortion service. Demographic data on a person who received abortion, including age, race, ethnicity, marital status, place of residence, gestational age of pregnancy, type of abortion and number of previously lived births.
A doctor who views the healthcare data on the screen (Kurt “Cyberguy” Knutsson)
In a Fox News Digital statement, Guttmacher spokesman said their “Recommendation is not an argument against countries that collect abortion data, but a discussion of risks and loads of ways in which That was collected. ”
“Completion of abortion reporting with the Government does not contradict rigor and accurate abortion data. We invite states to consider changing their laws and regulations to transfer voluntary data collection models, which can produce high quality data with the protection and privacy of patients and services.
Project 2025 It refers to the drart of the Think Think Think Conservative Heritage Foundation Policy and is not the official guide to Trump’s administration policy.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The report comes for almost three years after the Supreme Court in the United States canceled ROE against Wade – a 1973 decision that guarantees a women’s right to abortion – and many countries have since adopted abortion prohibitions.
AND Trump administration He also responded to the executive command from the Biden Era, which funded Federally funded abortion services, restarting the HYDE amendment, which forbids the use of federal dollars of taxpayers for electoral abortions.
