Breaking News

Trump: The founders of the ‘twin in their graves’ for the abuse of citizenship in birth


Following the judgment of the fourth judge who blocked his executive order in which the nationality of birth for children of illegal immigrants ended, President Donald Trump They took the truth of Social to say that fathers of the founders “spin in their graves” and that the 14th amendment was for former slaves, not illegals.

“Our lawyers and judges must be firm and protect America!” The president took a peek.

“Right 14. Amendments of US citizenship never had anything to do with modern” cards “,” illegal immigrants Whoever violated the law by being in our country has had anything to do with giving citizenship to former slaves, “he wrote.

“Our founders of fathers are” spinning in their graves “” on the idea that our country can be taken away from us, “he added.” No nation in the world has something like that. “

Trump freezes applications for migrant programs from Era Biden in the middle of fraud, concern for national security

The executive order of President Trump, which ends in birth, receives a congress reserve from the border state Republicans and others. (Getty Images)

In what has become perhaps his most controversial move, Trump has issued an executive command On the first day in an oval office to end the practice of giving citizenship of birth to children of illegal immigrants.

Command – entitled “Protection of the meaning and value of US citizenship” – says “the privilege of the citizenship of the United States does not automatically bind to persons born in the United States” when the parents of that person or illegally present in the US or when they are. The presence of parents is legal but temporary.

Ever since signed the command, lawsuits have filed Two ten countries and cities under the leadership of democratic and several groups for civil rights. Four judges of the federal district have rendered judgments that temporarily block the command because it operates through a long court proceedings.

The last verdict, passed by US District Judge Leo Sorokin last week, said “the Constitution gives citizenship to a large extent, including persons in the categories described.”

Mexico activists report that the flow of migrants “has been extremely reduced” for a month in Trump’s administrator

People who protested for the illegal immigration of President Donald Trump on Sunday broke into 101 highways in the Los Angeles center, causing great delays, police reported. (Fox 11 Los Angeles)

In response, several Republican states and America first legally They filed Amicus’ submissions in favor of Trump’s command, claiming that it was completely constitutionally and good in the original meaning of 14. amendments and in accordance with previous judgments by Now the Supreme Court.

Click here for more covering immigration

14. The amendment was adopted in 1868 and was designed to expand citizenship to African -American former slaves. Amendman says “all persons born or naturalized in the United States are subject to the competences, citizens of the United States and the state in which they live.”

After submitting two Amicus in favor of Trump’s order, US first Vice President Dan Epstein told Fox News Digital that the phrase “subjected to their jurisdiction” means that citizens must owe their political loyalty to the US, not some foreign power or culture.

Trump administrator reveals a list of cartels and gangs that will be appointed terrorist organization

The migrants who tried to enter the US illegally rushed to the border wall, on March 21, 2024, overthrowing the Texas of the National Guards before they were stopped. (James Breeden for New York Post / Mega)

Epstein believes that Trump’s command would return the constitutional principle that only those who are subject to the competences of the US are loyal, Americans who respect laws-citizens. He believes that the case is likely to end in the Supreme Court, where he is convinced that he will ultimately support himself.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“My expectation is that this is without any number. The law is clear,” in accordance with it, the jurisdiction, “must mean something,” he said. “So this is not a very difficult question. It is a very clear question and the law has a very clear answer.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com